Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

International Steel & Iron Co. v. National Surety Co.

• 1935 • 297 U.S. 657 • Hughes Court
In the case of International Steel & Iron Co. v. National Surety Co., the Supreme Court ruled on a dispute between two companies over a performance bond contract. The plaintiff, International Steel & Iron Company, had entered into an agreement with another company to construct steel tanks and provided a performance bond from National Surety Company as security for their contractual obligations. However, when they failed to complete the work according to schedule and specifications in the...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Hughes Court
Term: 1935
Docket: 252
297 U.S. 657
56 S. Ct. 619
80 L. Ed. 961
1936 U.S. LEXIS 949
Argued: Mar 11, 1936

International Steel & Iron Co. v. National Surety Co.

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of International Steel & Iron Co. v. National Surety Co., the Supreme Court ruled on a dispute between two companies over a performance bond contract. The plaintiff, International Steel & Iron Company, had entered into an agreement with another company to construct steel tanks and provided a performance bond from National Surety Company as security for their contractual obligations. However, when they failed to complete the work according to schedule and specifications in the contract, they were sued by both parties involved - one for breach of contract and another by National Surety seeking indemnity for losses incurred due to paying out on the bond claim. The key issue before court was whether or not International Steel could be held liable under its indemnity agreement with National Surety even though it claimed that it had been prevented from completing its contractual obligations due to unforeseen circumstances beyond its control (force majeure). The Supreme Court upheld lower courts' decisions ruling against International Steel stating that force majeure did not absolve them from liability since such provisions were not included in their contracts either explicitly or implicitly.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for International Steel & Iron Co. v. National Surety Co., Justice Stone argued that the majority's decision was inconsistent with previous rulings and principles of contract law. He contended that a surety should not be held liable beyond its express contractual obligations, particularly when it had no control over or knowledge of the circumstances leading to increased liability. In this case, he believed that National Surety Company should not be responsible for additional costs incurred due to changes in labor rates because these were unforeseen at the time of contract formation and outside their control or influence. Furthermore, he emphasized that such an imposition could lead to unjust enrichment on part of International Steel & Iron Company as they would benefit from higher compensation without bearing any risk themselves.

Opinion written by Justice OJRoberts
Decided: Mar 30, 1936
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms