Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Irving Trust Co., Trustee In Bankruptcy, v. A. W. Perry, Inc.

• 1934 • 293 U.S. 307 • Hughes Court
In the case of Irving Trust Co. v. A.W. Perry, Inc., in 1934, the U.S Supreme Court ruled on a dispute involving bankruptcy law and property rights. The Irving Trust Company was acting as trustee for a bankrupt company that had leased land from A.W Perry, Inc., but defaulted on its lease payments before declaring bankruptcy. The question at hand was whether or not the trustee could reject this unexpired lease under Section 70b of the Bankruptcy Act without surrendering possession of the...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Hughes Court
Term: 1934
Docket: 22
293 U.S. 307
55 S. Ct. 150
79 L. Ed. 379
1934 U.S. LEXIS 1008
Argued: Nov 05, 1934

Irving Trust Co., Trustee In Bankruptcy, v. A. W. Perry, Inc.

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of Irving Trust Co. v. A.W. Perry, Inc., in 1934, the U.S Supreme Court ruled on a dispute involving bankruptcy law and property rights. The Irving Trust Company was acting as trustee for a bankrupt company that had leased land from A.W Perry, Inc., but defaulted on its lease payments before declaring bankruptcy. The question at hand was whether or not the trustee could reject this unexpired lease under Section 70b of the Bankruptcy Act without surrendering possession of the premises to A.W Perry, Inc. The court held that while trustees have broad powers to disaffirm burdensome contracts under Section 70b, they cannot retain benefits conferred by such contracts after disaffirmation - including possession of leased premises - unless they continue to meet contractual obligations like paying rent. Therefore, if a bankrupt lessee's trustee wishes to remain in possession of rented property after rejecting an unexpired lease contractually binding them to pay rent (a burden), then it must continue meeting those rental obligations (benefits). This ruling effectively balanced interests between lessors seeking payment and trustees trying to maximize value for creditors during bankruptcy proceedings.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for Irving Trust Co. v. A.W. Perry, Inc., Justice Cardozo disagreed with the majority's decision to allow a trustee in bankruptcy to recover payments made by an insolvent debtor within four months of filing for bankruptcy if those payments were preferential and enabled any creditor to receive more than they would have under normal bankruptcy proceedings. He argued that this interpretation was too broad and went beyond what Congress intended when it enacted the Bankruptcy Act of 1898, which aimed at preventing fraudulent transfers rather than all preferences. According to him, not every preference is fraudulent or unjust; some are justifiable and should be allowed even in insolvency cases as long as there is no intent on part of debtor or recipient to hinder, delay or defraud other creditors.

Opinion written by Justice OJRoberts
Decided: Dec 03, 1934
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms