Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Carrie Jaffee, Special Administrator For Ricky Allen, Sr., Deceased v. Mary Lu Redmond Et Al.

• 1995 • 518 U.S. 1 • Rehnquist Court
In the case of Carrie Jaffee v. Mary Lu Redmond et al., 1995, the U.S Supreme Court ruled that confidential communications between a licensed psychotherapist and their patients are protected under federal law. The case arose after Ricky Allen was killed by police officers in Chicago who were responding to a call about an armed man behaving erratically. His family sued for wrongful death and sought notes from therapy sessions he had with social worker Mary Lu Redmond as part of their evidence....Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Rehnquist Court
Term: 1995
Docket: 95-266
518 U.S. 1
116 S. Ct. 1923
135 L. Ed. 2d 337
1996 U.S. LEXIS 3879
Argued: Feb 26, 1996

Carrie Jaffee, Special Administrator For Ricky Allen, Sr., Deceased v. Mary Lu Redmond Et Al.

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of Carrie Jaffee v. Mary Lu Redmond et al., 1995, the U.S Supreme Court ruled that confidential communications between a licensed psychotherapist and their patients are protected under federal law. The case arose after Ricky Allen was killed by police officers in Chicago who were responding to a call about an armed man behaving erratically. His family sued for wrongful death and sought notes from therapy sessions he had with social worker Mary Lu Redmond as part of their evidence. However, she refused to provide them citing patient confidentiality rights. The court sided with her, establishing that such communications have privileged status unless waived by the patient or in cases where serious harm is threatened.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for Carrie Jaffee v. Mary Lu Redmond, Justice Scalia argued that there was no reason to create a federal psychotherapist-patient privilege in this case. He believed that such decisions should be left to state courts and legislatures who are more familiar with their own local conditions and needs. Furthermore, he contended that creating such a privilege could potentially hinder law enforcement efforts by protecting information relevant to criminal investigations or trials. Lastly, he pointed out inconsistencies in the majority's reasoning regarding when exceptions might apply to this newly created privilege.

Opinion written by Justice JPStevens
Decided: Jun 13, 1996
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcript
Argued: Oct 05, 2026
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms