Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Jenness Et Al. v. Fortson, Secretary Of State Of Georgia

• 1970 • 403 U.S. 431 • Burger Court
In the 1970 case of Jenness et al. v. Fortson, Secretary of State of Georgia, the U.S Supreme Court unanimously upheld a Georgia law that required independent candidates and new political parties to petition for ballot access by obtaining signatures from 5% of eligible voters in order to appear on general election ballots. The plaintiffs argued this was an unconstitutional burden on their First Amendment rights and violated equal protection under the Fourteenth Amendment as established major...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Burger Court
Term: 1970
Docket: 5714
403 U.S. 431
91 S. Ct. 1970
29 L. Ed. 2d 554
1971 U.S. LEXIS 24
Argued: Mar 01, 1971

Jenness Et Al. v. Fortson, Secretary Of State Of Georgia

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the 1970 case of Jenness et al. v. Fortson, Secretary of State of Georgia, the U.S Supreme Court unanimously upheld a Georgia law that required independent candidates and new political parties to petition for ballot access by obtaining signatures from 5% of eligible voters in order to appear on general election ballots. The plaintiffs argued this was an unconstitutional burden on their First Amendment rights and violated equal protection under the Fourteenth Amendment as established major parties were not subject to these requirements. However, Justice Hugo Black writing for the court found no constitutional violation because all aspirants are treated equally; they can either choose to become a candidate through one of two routes - via an existing party or as an independent/new party candidate with sufficient public support demonstrated through petitions.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

There was no dissenting opinion in the case of Jenness et al. v. Fortson, Secretary of State of Georgia, 1970 as it was a unanimous decision by the Supreme Court.

Opinion written by Justice PStewart
Decided: Jun 21, 1971
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcript
Argued: Oct 05, 2026
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms