Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Jewell Ridge Coal Corporation v. Local No. 6167, United Mine Workers Of America Et Al.

• 1944 • 325 U.S. 161 • Stone Court
The U.S. Supreme Court case Jewell Ridge Coal Corporation v. Local No. 6167, United Mine Workers of America et al., revolved around the issue of whether time spent by coal miners traveling underground to and from their work sites should be considered compensable working time under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). The plaintiff, Jewell Ridge Coal Corporation, argued that this travel time was not part of the workers' productive workday and therefore should not be compensated. However, the...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Stone Court
Term: 1944
Docket: 721
325 U.S. 161
65 S. Ct. 1063
89 L. Ed. 1534
1945 U.S. LEXIS 2689
Argued: Mar 09, 1945

Jewell Ridge Coal Corporation v. Local No. 6167, United Mine Workers Of America Et Al.

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

The U.S. Supreme Court case Jewell Ridge Coal Corporation v. Local No. 6167, United Mine Workers of America et al., revolved around the issue of whether time spent by coal miners traveling underground to and from their work sites should be considered compensable working time under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). The plaintiff, Jewell Ridge Coal Corporation, argued that this travel time was not part of the workers' productive workday and therefore should not be compensated. However, the defendants - a local union representing coal miners - contended that these travel times were integral parts of their jobs and thus they deserved compensation for it. In its decision in favor of the mine workers (Local No. 6167), the Supreme Court held that such travel time did indeed constitute "work" as defined by FLSA because it was an essential aspect of mining operations which required effort exerted for employer's benefit; hence it must be compensated accordingly.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for Jewell Ridge Coal Corporation v. Local No. 6167, United Mine Workers of America et al., Justice Robert H. Jackson argued that the majority's decision to include travel time within a miner's workday was not supported by either precedent or legislative history and would lead to unjust results for employers. He contended that Congress did not intend for travel time to be included in working hours when it passed the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). Furthermore, he expressed concern about potential economic consequences of this ruling on coal companies already struggling with low profit margins and high operating costs due to wartime price controls. In his view, such an interpretation could potentially bankrupt many businesses if they were required retroactively pay wages for travel time under FLSA provisions.

Opinion written by Justice FMurphy
Decided: May 07, 1945
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms