Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

John L. Whiting -- J.j. Adams Company v. Burrill, Treasurer And Receiver-general Of The Commonwealth Of Massachusetts

• 1921 • 258 U.S. 39 • Taft Court
The case of John L. Whiting - J.J. Adams Company v. Burrill, Treasurer and Receiver-General of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts in 1921 revolved around a dispute over taxation laws in Massachusetts. The plaintiff, J.J Adams Company, was an out-of-state corporation that had sold goods to customers within Massachusetts but argued it should not be subject to local taxes as its business operations were conducted outside state lines. However, the Supreme Court ruled against this argument stating...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Taft Court
Term: 1921
Docket: 113
258 U.S. 39
42 S. Ct. 257
66 L. Ed. 453
1922 U.S. LEXIS 2236
Argued: Jan 25, 1922

John L. Whiting -- J.j. Adams Company v. Burrill, Treasurer And Receiver-general Of The Commonwealth Of Massachusetts

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

The case of John L. Whiting - J.J. Adams Company v. Burrill, Treasurer and Receiver-General of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts in 1921 revolved around a dispute over taxation laws in Massachusetts. The plaintiff, J.J Adams Company, was an out-of-state corporation that had sold goods to customers within Massachusetts but argued it should not be subject to local taxes as its business operations were conducted outside state lines. However, the Supreme Court ruled against this argument stating that since the company benefited from protections provided by the state's government such as police protection and public infrastructure use while conducting their sales activities within its borders, they were indeed liable for tax obligations under Massachusetts law despite being incorporated elsewhere.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

The dissenting opinion in the case of John L. Whiting -- J.J. Adams Company v. Burrill, Treasurer and Receiver-General of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, 1921 was not specified or detailed in available resources. Therefore, it is impossible to provide a summary for it at this time.

Opinion written by Justice OWHolmes
Decided: Feb 27, 1922
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms