Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Johnson v. Railway Express Agency, Inc., Et Al.

• 1974 • 421 U.S. 454 • Burger Court
In Johnson v. Railway Express Agency, Inc., the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that filing a complaint with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) does not toll the statute of limitations for filing a lawsuit under Section 1981 of the Civil Rights Act of 1866. The plaintiff, Johnson, had filed an EEOC complaint alleging racial discrimination by his employer but did not file a lawsuit until after the two-year statute of limitations period had passed. He argued that his EEOC claim should...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Burger Court
Term: 1974
Docket: 73-1543
421 U.S. 454
95 S. Ct. 1716
44 L. Ed. 2d 295
1975 U.S. LEXIS 15
Argued: Dec 11, 1974

Johnson v. Railway Express Agency, Inc., Et Al.

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In Johnson v. Railway Express Agency, Inc., the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that filing a complaint with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) does not toll the statute of limitations for filing a lawsuit under Section 1981 of the Civil Rights Act of 1866. The plaintiff, Johnson, had filed an EEOC complaint alleging racial discrimination by his employer but did not file a lawsuit until after the two-year statute of limitations period had passed. He argued that his EEOC claim should have tolled this period and allowed him to proceed with his suit. However, in its decision issued in 1974, the court disagreed and held that these were separate remedies which must be pursued independently within their respective timeframes.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for Johnson v. Railway Express Agency, Inc., Justice Powell argued that the majority's decision to separate Title VII and Section 1981 claims into distinct legal avenues was misguided. He contended that this separation could potentially lead to confusion and inconsistency in lower courts due to the overlapping nature of these two civil rights statutes. Furthermore, he expressed concern over potential abuse by plaintiffs who might strategically delay filing a lawsuit under one statute until after they have exhausted their remedies under another statute. This, according to him, would undermine Congress' intent in establishing time limits for bringing discrimination claims forward. Therefore, he disagreed with the majority's interpretation of how these laws should be applied concurrently.

Opinion written by Justice HABlackmun
Decided: May 19, 1975
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcript
Argued: Oct 05, 2026
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms