Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

James R. Jones, Charles C. Jones, William G. Gorman, Robert Lott, John Tippin, Matthew T. Tippin And John R. Tally, Plaintiffs In Error, v. Catherine Mcmasters, By Her Next Friend, Manuel Ybarba

1857 • 61 U.S. 8 • Taney Court
This US Supreme Court case involved seven plaintiffs in error, James R. Jones, Charles C. Jones, William G. Gorman, Robert Lott, John Tippin, Matthew T. Tippin and John R. Tally who were suing Catherine McMasters by her next friend Manuel Ybarba for a dispute over land ownership rights in California during the Mexican-American War of 1846-1848 period when Mexico ceded the area to the United States under the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo which was ratified on July 4th 1848 . The court ruled that...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Taney Court
Term: 1857
61 U.S. 8
15 L. Ed. 805
1857 U.S. LEXIS 424
Argued: Dec 16, 1857

James R. Jones, Charles C. Jones, William G. Gorman, Robert Lott, John Tippin, Matthew T. Tippin And John R. Tally, Plaintiffs In Error, v. Catherine Mcmasters, By Her Next Friend, Manuel Ybarba

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

This US Supreme Court case involved seven plaintiffs in error, James R. Jones, Charles C. Jones, William G. Gorman, Robert Lott, John Tippin, Matthew T. Tippin and John R. Tally who were suing Catherine McMasters by her next friend Manuel Ybarba for a dispute over land ownership rights in California during the Mexican-American War of 1846-1848 period when Mexico ceded the area to the United States under the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo which was ratified on July 4th 1848 . The court ruled that since there had been no grant from either government prior to this date then neither party could claim legal title or possession of any lands within what is now known as California and thus dismissed all claims made by both parties against each other with regards to said property rights

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion of this case, Justice Catron argued that the plaintiffs had failed to prove their claim. He stated that they did not provide sufficient evidence to show a legal title in themselves or any other person from whom they derived it. Furthermore, he noted that even if there was such proof, it would be insufficient because no act of Congress authorized them to bring suit against Catherine McMasters for her land. In conclusion, Justice Catron concluded that the court should have dismissed the case and allowed Catherine McMasters' possession of her land without interference from anyone else.

Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms