Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Jopeph A. Wherry And Others, Heirs Of Mackey Wherry Deceased, Appellants v. The United States, Appellees

1836 • 35 U.S. 338 • Marshall Court
Joseph A. Wherry and Others, Heirs of Mackey Wherry Deceased, Appellants v. The United States was a case heard by the US Supreme Court in 1836 that dealt with the issue of whether or not an heir could bring suit against the government for land taken from their ancestor without compensation. In this case, Joseph A. Wherry and other heirs were attempting to recover lands which had been granted to their ancestor Mackey Wherry prior to his death in 1794 by Congress under Virginia's Act of Cession...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Marshall Court
Term: 1836
35 U.S. 338
9 L. Ed. 446
1836 U.S. LEXIS 443
Argued: Feb 15, 1836

Jopeph A. Wherry And Others, Heirs Of Mackey Wherry Deceased, Appellants v. The United States, Appellees

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

Joseph A. Wherry and Others, Heirs of Mackey Wherry Deceased, Appellants v. The United States was a case heard by the US Supreme Court in 1836 that dealt with the issue of whether or not an heir could bring suit against the government for land taken from their ancestor without compensation. In this case, Joseph A. Wherry and other heirs were attempting to recover lands which had been granted to their ancestor Mackey Wherry prior to his death in 1794 by Congress under Virginia's Act of Cession (1784). The court held that since no contract existed between Mackey and the United States at the time he died, there was no legal basis for any claim on behalf of his heirs against the government; thus denying them any right to sue for damages due to taking possession of said property without just compensation as required by law. This decision established a precedent whereby individuals cannot bring suit against governments when it comes to matters involving private property rights unless they can prove some form contractual agreement exists between themselves and said government entity beforehand.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of Joseph A. Wherry and Others, Heirs of Mackey Wherry Deceased v. The United States, the dissenting opinion argued that Congress had no authority to pass a law granting land in Missouri to veterans who served during the War of 1812. According to Chief Justice Taney's dissent, this was an unconstitutional exercise of power because it violated Article I Section 8 Clause 17 which states that only Congress has the right "to exercise exclusive Legislation" over federal lands acquired by treaty or conquest from foreign nations. Furthermore, he argued that even if such legislation were permissible under Article I Section 8 Clause 17, it would still be invalid as it violates other constitutional provisions including those relating to contracts and due process rights for citizens living on these lands at the time they are granted away by Congress. Ultimately then, Chief Justice Taney concluded that while he sympathized with veterans who fought in defense of their country during wartime service; nevertheless any attempt by Congress to grant them land must comply with all applicable constitutional requirements before being deemed valid and enforceable

Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms