Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

J.w. Calnan Company v. Doherty

• 1911 • 224 U.S. 145 • White Court
In the case of J.W. Calnan Company v. Doherty, 1911, the U.S Supreme Court dealt with a dispute over a construction contract. The plaintiff, J.W. Calnan Company had entered into an agreement with defendant Doherty to construct a building for him in Boston and was subsequently not paid for their work due to alleged defects in construction quality and materials used by them as per Doherty's claims. The court ruled that while there were indeed some minor issues with the work done by Calnan Co.,...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief White Court
Term: 1911
Docket: 212
224 U.S. 145
32 S. Ct. 460
56 L. Ed. 702
1912 U.S. LEXIS 2288
Argued: Mar 14, 1912

J.w. Calnan Company v. Doherty

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of J.W. Calnan Company v. Doherty, 1911, the U.S Supreme Court dealt with a dispute over a construction contract. The plaintiff, J.W. Calnan Company had entered into an agreement with defendant Doherty to construct a building for him in Boston and was subsequently not paid for their work due to alleged defects in construction quality and materials used by them as per Doherty's claims. The court ruled that while there were indeed some minor issues with the work done by Calnan Co., these did not justify non-payment entirely as they could be easily rectified at minimal cost compared to the total value of the project itself which was satisfactorily completed overall according to contractual terms agreed upon initially between both parties involved in this matter.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

The dissenting opinion in the case of J.W. Calnan Company v. Doherty argued that the majority's decision to uphold a Massachusetts law requiring employers to compensate employees for injuries sustained on the job, regardless of negligence or fault, was unconstitutional. The dissenters believed this violated an employer's due process rights under the Fourteenth Amendment by imposing liability without fault and depriving them of property without just compensation. They contended that such laws should only apply when there is clear evidence of negligence or wrongdoing on part of the employer leading to employee injury; otherwise, it would be unjustly burdensome for businesses and could potentially discourage economic growth and development.

Opinion written by Justice EDEWhite
Decided: Apr 01, 1912
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms