Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Katzenbach, Acting Attorney General, Et Al. v. Mcclung Et Al.

• 1964 • 379 U.S. 294 • Warren Court
In the 1964 case of Katzenbach v. McClung, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that Congress acted within its power under the Commerce Clause of the Constitution when it enacted the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which prohibited racial discrimination in restaurants as this impacted interstate commerce. The case was brought by Ollie's Barbecue, a family-owned restaurant in Birmingham, Alabama that refused to serve black customers in its main dining area. The owners argued that since their business was...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Warren Court
Term: 1964
Docket: 543
379 U.S. 294
85 S. Ct. 377
13 L. Ed. 2d 290
1964 U.S. LEXIS 2188
Argued: Oct 05, 1964

Katzenbach, Acting Attorney General, Et Al. v. Mcclung Et Al.

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the 1964 case of Katzenbach v. McClung, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that Congress acted within its power under the Commerce Clause of the Constitution when it enacted the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which prohibited racial discrimination in restaurants as this impacted interstate commerce. The case was brought by Ollie's Barbecue, a family-owned restaurant in Birmingham, Alabama that refused to serve black customers in its main dining area. The owners argued that since their business was mostly local and did not engage directly with interstate commerce, they were exempt from federal regulation under said act. However, Justice Tom C Clark delivered an unanimous decision stating that even if a portion of food served came from out-of-state suppliers (46% for Ollie’s), then such businesses had enough connection to interstate commerce to be regulated by Congress.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of Katzenbach v. McClung, Justice Potter Stewart dissented from the majority opinion. He argued that while he agreed with the Court's decision in Heart of Atlanta Motel Inc. v United States (which upheld Congress' power to regulate interstate commerce), he could not agree with its application in this particular case involving Ollie’s Barbecue, a local restaurant in Birmingham, Alabama. According to him, there was insufficient evidence to prove that racial discrimination by this specific restaurant had a direct and substantial effect on interstate commerce - which is necessary for federal regulation under the Commerce Clause of Constitution. Therefore, applying Title II of Civil Rights Act 1964 (prohibiting racial discrimination by places of public accommodation) would be an overreach into matters reserved for state law or private resolution.

Opinion written by Justice TCClark
Decided: Dec 14, 1964
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms