Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Kelley Et Al. v. Everglades Drainage District

• 1942 • 319 U.S. 415 • Stone Court
In the case of Kelley et al. v. Everglades Drainage District, 1942, the U.S Supreme Court ruled in favor of the Everglades Drainage District against a group of bondholders led by Mr. Kelley who had sued for payment on bonds issued by the district to finance drainage and reclamation projects in Florida's Everglades region. The court held that although there was an implied contract between bondholders and issuers, it did not extend to guaranteeing specific tax rates or revenues for repayment as...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Stone Court
Term: 1942
Docket: 935
319 U.S. 415
63 S. Ct. 1141
87 L. Ed. 1485
1943 U.S. LEXIS 1181

Kelley Et Al. v. Everglades Drainage District

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of Kelley et al. v. Everglades Drainage District, 1942, the U.S Supreme Court ruled in favor of the Everglades Drainage District against a group of bondholders led by Mr. Kelley who had sued for payment on bonds issued by the district to finance drainage and reclamation projects in Florida's Everglades region. The court held that although there was an implied contract between bondholders and issuers, it did not extend to guaranteeing specific tax rates or revenues for repayment as argued by Mr.Kelley and his co-plaintiffs. Instead, they found that such guarantees would infringe upon state sovereignty rights over taxation policy which are protected under federal law from interference through contracts clause claims unless explicitly stated otherwise within legislation authorizing their issuance.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for Kelley et al. v. Everglades Drainage District, Justice Black argued that the majority's decision was a departure from established constitutional principles regarding taxation and property rights. He contended that Florida’s law allowing special tax districts to levy assessments on land without providing notice or opportunity for hearing violated due process rights under the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution. According to him, this lack of procedural safeguards could lead to arbitrary and unfair taxation practices by local authorities which would infringe upon individual property rights protected by constitutionally guaranteed due process protections. Furthermore, he disagreed with the majority's assertion that these taxes were not personal liabilities but rather liens against properties; thus implying owners had no right to contest them before they were imposed.

Opinion written by Justice
Decided: Jun 01, 1943
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms