Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Samuel Kelly, A Citizen Of New York, Plaintiff In Error v. James Jackson, A Citizen Of New Jersey, Defendant In Error, Ex Dem. Henry Gage Morris, Maria Morris, Thomas Hincks, John Hincks, Aliens And British Subjects, John Jacob Astor, Theodosius Fowler, Cadwallader D. Colden And Cornelius I. Bogart, Citizes Of New Jersey

1832 • 31 U.S. 622 • Marshall Court
In this Supreme Court case, Samuel Kelly, a citizen of New York, was the plaintiff in error and James Jackson, a citizen of New Jersey was the defendant in error. Henry Gage Morris and Maria Morris were aliens and British subjects while Thomas Hincks, John Hincks, John Jacob Astor Theodosius Fowler Cadwallader D. Colden and Cornelius I. Bogart were citizens of New Jersey. This case revolved around an action for damages that had been brought by Kelly against Jackson due to some land disputes...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Marshall Court
Term: 1832
31 U.S. 622
8 L. Ed. 523
1832 U.S. LEXIS 491
Argued: Feb 06, 1832

Samuel Kelly, A Citizen Of New York, Plaintiff In Error v. James Jackson, A Citizen Of New Jersey, Defendant In Error, Ex Dem. Henry Gage Morris, Maria Morris, Thomas Hincks, John Hincks, Aliens And British Subjects, John Jacob Astor, Theodosius Fowler, Cadwallader D. Colden And Cornelius I. Bogart, Citizes Of New Jersey

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In this Supreme Court case, Samuel Kelly, a citizen of New York, was the plaintiff in error and James Jackson, a citizen of New Jersey was the defendant in error. Henry Gage Morris and Maria Morris were aliens and British subjects while Thomas Hincks, John Hincks, John Jacob Astor Theodosius Fowler Cadwallader D. Colden and Cornelius I. Bogart were citizens of New Jersey. This case revolved around an action for damages that had been brought by Kelly against Jackson due to some land disputes between them which resulted from certain agreements made between them regarding their respective lands located on both sides of the border separating New York from New Jersey. Ultimately it was decided that since these agreements did not comply with laws set forth by either state they could not be enforced as such; thus no damages would be awarded to either party involved in this dispute.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of Samuel Kelly v. James Jackson, the dissenting opinion was that a state court had no jurisdiction to hear a case involving aliens and British subjects as parties. The plaintiff argued that since he was an American citizen, his rights should be protected by the state court; however, this argument did not hold up in light of existing federal laws which stated that only federal courts could have jurisdiction over cases involving foreign citizens or nations. Therefore, it was ruled that the state court lacked authority to hear such matters and thus dismissed all claims against them.

Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms