Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

City Of Kenosha Et Al. v. Bruno Et Al.

• 1972 • 412 U.S. 507 • Burger Court
The U.S. Supreme Court case City of Kenosha et al. v. Bruno et al., 1972, revolved around the issue of whether municipalities are considered "persons" under federal law and therefore liable for damages in civil rights cases. The Brunos sued the city of Kenosha, Wisconsin after their property was damaged during a police search which they claimed violated their Fourth Amendment rights against unreasonable searches and seizures. They sought compensation under Section 1983 of Title 42, which allows...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Burger Court
Term: 1972
Docket: 72-658
412 U.S. 507
93 S. Ct. 2222
37 L. Ed. 2d 109
1973 U.S. LEXIS 58
Argued: Apr 18, 1973

City Of Kenosha Et Al. v. Bruno Et Al.

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

The U.S. Supreme Court case City of Kenosha et al. v. Bruno et al., 1972, revolved around the issue of whether municipalities are considered "persons" under federal law and therefore liable for damages in civil rights cases. The Brunos sued the city of Kenosha, Wisconsin after their property was damaged during a police search which they claimed violated their Fourth Amendment rights against unreasonable searches and seizures. They sought compensation under Section 1983 of Title 42, which allows individuals to sue persons who violate their constitutional rights while acting under color of state law. However, the Supreme Court ruled that municipalities were not considered "persons" within this context and thus could not be held accountable for monetary damages in such lawsuits as per Section 1983's provisions at that time (the statute has since been amended). This decision effectively shielded local governments from financial liability in civil rights violations unless there is explicit statutory language indicating otherwise.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for the City of Kenosha et al. v. Bruno et al., Justice Douglas argued that municipalities should not be immune from lawsuits under Section 1983, which allows individuals to sue state and local governments for civil rights violations. He contended that this immunity undermines the purpose of Section 1983, which was enacted to provide a federal remedy against those who violate civil rights under color of state law. Furthermore, he pointed out that Congress did not explicitly grant such immunity in the statute itself or its legislative history. Therefore, according to Justice Douglas's interpretation, it is inappropriate for courts to infer this immunity where none was intended by lawmakers.

Opinion written by Justice WHRehnquist
Decided: Jun 11, 1973
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcript
Argued: Oct 05, 2026
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms