Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Keyishian Et Al. v. Board Of Regents Of The University Of The State Of New York Et Al.

• 1966 • 385 U.S. 589 • Warren Court
The Keyishian v. Board of Regents case in 1966 was a landmark decision by the U.S. Supreme Court that ruled against laws requiring educators to sign loyalty oaths or risk losing their jobs. The court held that such laws violated First Amendment rights to free speech and thought, as they were too vague and had a chilling effect on academic freedom. This case involved faculty members at the University at Buffalo who refused to certify that they were not Communists, leading to their dismissal from...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Warren Court
Term: 1966
Docket: 105
385 U.S. 589
87 S. Ct. 675
17 L. Ed. 2d 629
1967 U.S. LEXIS 2454
Argued: Nov 17, 1966

Keyishian Et Al. v. Board Of Regents Of The University Of The State Of New York Et Al.

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

The Keyishian v. Board of Regents case in 1966 was a landmark decision by the U.S. Supreme Court that ruled against laws requiring educators to sign loyalty oaths or risk losing their jobs. The court held that such laws violated First Amendment rights to free speech and thought, as they were too vague and had a chilling effect on academic freedom. This case involved faculty members at the University at Buffalo who refused to certify that they were not Communists, leading to their dismissal from employment under New York's Feinberg Law which prohibited state employees from belonging to subversive groups. The Supreme Court struck down this law, stating it infringed upon constitutional protections for freedom of expression and association.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for Keyishian v. Board of Regents, Justice White argued that the majority's decision was an overreach and a misinterpretation of First Amendment rights. He contended that it is within the state's right to ensure loyalty from its employees, including those at public universities. The laws in question were designed to prevent subversive activities by requiring teachers to certify they are not members of any organization advocating for violent overthrow of government; this does not infringe upon their freedom of speech or association as per his view. Furthermore, he believed these requirements were reasonable given past instances where communist organizations had infiltrated educational institutions with intent to spread propaganda and incite rebellion against democratic governments.

Opinion written by Justice WJBrennan
Decided: Jan 23, 1967
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms