Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Knights Templars' And Masons' Life Indemnity Company v. Jarman

• 1902 • 187 U.S. 197 • Fuller Court
In the case of Knights Templars' and Masons' Life Indemnity Company v. Jarman, 1902, the U.S Supreme Court dealt with a dispute over an insurance policy. The plaintiff was an insurance company that had issued a life insurance policy to Mr. Jarman's wife who later passed away. After her death, Mr. Jarman filed for the claim but it was denied by the insurer on grounds that Mrs.Jarman had misrepresented her health condition while obtaining the policy which constituted fraud under Kentucky law...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Fuller Court
Term: 1902
Docket: 48
187 U.S. 197
23 S. Ct. 108
47 L. Ed. 139
1902 U.S. LEXIS 791
Argued: Oct 17, 1902

Knights Templars' And Masons' Life Indemnity Company v. Jarman

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of Knights Templars' and Masons' Life Indemnity Company v. Jarman, 1902, the U.S Supreme Court dealt with a dispute over an insurance policy. The plaintiff was an insurance company that had issued a life insurance policy to Mr. Jarman's wife who later passed away. After her death, Mr. Jarman filed for the claim but it was denied by the insurer on grounds that Mrs.Jarman had misrepresented her health condition while obtaining the policy which constituted fraud under Kentucky law where they resided. The court held in favor of Mr.Jarman stating that although there were discrepancies in Mrs.Jarman’s statements about her health at different times, these did not amount to fraudulent misrepresentation as she might have been unaware of having any serious illness when she applied for coverage or could have misunderstood questions asked during medical examination process. Moreover, it was also noted by Justice Peckham delivering opinion for majority judges that even if such misrepresentations were made knowingly and intentionally by insured person themselves (which wasn't proven here), insurers still needed to demonstrate how exactly those affected their decision-making regarding issuance or pricing of policies before they could deny claims based on them.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

The dissenting opinion in the Knights Templars' and Masons' Life Indemnity Company v. Jarman case argued that the majority's decision was incorrect because it failed to properly consider the terms of the insurance policy at issue. The dissent believed that, according to its interpretation of contract law principles, an insurer should not be allowed to deny coverage based on a technicality if there is no evidence suggesting fraud or misrepresentation by the insured party. In this particular case, they felt that Mr. Jarman had acted in good faith when he purchased his life insurance policy from Knights Templar and Masons’ Life Indemnity Company; therefore, his widow should have been entitled to receive benefits after his death despite any minor discrepancies found within their agreement.

Opinion written by Justice HBBrown
Decided: Dec 08, 1902
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms