Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

La Crosse Telephone Corp. v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Board Et Al.

• 1948 • 336 U.S. 18 • Vinson Court
In the case of La Crosse Telephone Corp. v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Board et al., 1948, the U.S Supreme Court ruled in favor of the Wisconsin Employment Relations Board (WERB). The dispute arose when WERB ordered La Crosse Telephone Corporation to bargain with a union that had been certified by National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) as an exclusive representative for certain employees, despite not having jurisdiction over telephone companies at that time due to federal law changes. The...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Vinson Court
Term: 1948
Docket: 38
336 U.S. 18
69 S. Ct. 379
93 L. Ed. 2d 463
1949 U.S. LEXIS 3018
Argued: Nov 18, 1948

La Crosse Telephone Corp. v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Board Et Al.

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of La Crosse Telephone Corp. v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Board et al., 1948, the U.S Supreme Court ruled in favor of the Wisconsin Employment Relations Board (WERB). The dispute arose when WERB ordered La Crosse Telephone Corporation to bargain with a union that had been certified by National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) as an exclusive representative for certain employees, despite not having jurisdiction over telephone companies at that time due to federal law changes. The company refused and was found guilty of unfair labor practices by WERB which led them to appeal up to the Supreme Court arguing state interference with federal control over labor relations in industries affecting commerce. However, their argument was rejected on grounds that Congress did not intend for states to be completely barred from regulating industrial disputes just because they affected interstate commerce but rather intended a more cooperative approach between state and national governments regarding such matters.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

The dissenting opinion in the La Crosse Telephone Corp. v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Board case argued that the majority's decision was a departure from established principles of federalism and labor law, which traditionally allowed states to regulate their own labor relations unless explicitly preempted by federal law. The dissent emphasized that there was no clear evidence of congressional intent to exclude state jurisdiction over labor disputes involving interstate communication companies, pointing out that Congress had not expressly stated such an intention when it enacted the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA). Furthermore, they contended that even if there were some areas where both state and national authorities could exercise concurrent jurisdiction under NLRA, this did not necessarily mean complete preemption of state power. They also expressed concern about potential negative implications for workers' rights and collective bargaining processes due to limiting states' ability to intervene in these matters.

Opinion written by Justice WODouglas
Decided: Jan 17, 1949
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms