Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

National Labor Relations Board v. Virginia Electric & Power Co.

• 1941 • 314 U.S. 469 • Stone Court
In the case of National Labor Relations Board v. Virginia Electric & Power Co., 1941, the U.S Supreme Court ruled in favor of the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB). The NLRB had accused Virginia Electric & Power Company of unfair labor practices for refusing to bargain with a union that was certified by the board as a representative for its employees. The company argued that it did not have to negotiate because there were disputes about whether certain workers should be included in or...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Stone Court
Term: 1941
Docket: 25
314 U.S. 469
62 S. Ct. 344
86 L. Ed. 348
1941 U.S. LEXIS 1135
Argued: Nov 13, 1941

National Labor Relations Board v. Virginia Electric & Power Co.

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of National Labor Relations Board v. Virginia Electric & Power Co., 1941, the U.S Supreme Court ruled in favor of the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB). The NLRB had accused Virginia Electric & Power Company of unfair labor practices for refusing to bargain with a union that was certified by the board as a representative for its employees. The company argued that it did not have to negotiate because there were disputes about whether certain workers should be included in or excluded from the bargaining unit. However, Justice Hugo Black delivered an opinion stating that once a union is certified by NLRB, an employer must bargain with it and cannot refuse on grounds related to internal issues within said union or disagreements over which employees are represented. This decision reinforced federal laws protecting collective bargaining rights and clarified employers' obligations under those laws.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for the case of National Labor Relations Board v. Virginia Electric & Power Co., Justice Roberts argued that the majority's decision was a departure from established principles governing labor disputes. He contended that there was no evidence to suggest that Virginia Electric had refused to bargain collectively with its employees, as required by law. Instead, he believed it was clear from the record that negotiations had taken place and an impasse had been reached due to disagreements over wage rates - a matter which falls under collective bargaining but is not mandated by law. Therefore, in his view, Virginia Electric should not be penalized for failing to reach an agreement on wages when they were willing and did engage in good faith bargaining efforts.

Opinion written by Justice FMurphy
Decided: Dec 22, 1941
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms