Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Lamar, Executor, v. Mccay

• 1883 • 109 U.S. 235 • Waite Court
Lamar, Executor v. McCay is a United States Supreme Court case from 1883. The case involved a dispute between the executor of a deceased man's estate and the deceased man's widow. The executor argued that the widow was not entitled to a portion of the estate, as the deceased man had made a will that excluded her from receiving any of the estate. The widow argued that the will was invalid, as it had been made under duress. The Supreme Court ultimately sided with the executor, ruling that the...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Waite Court
Term: 1883
Docket: 882
109 U.S. 235
3 S. Ct. 167
27 L. Ed. 919
1883 U.S. LEXIS 966

Lamar, Executor, v. Mccay

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

Lamar, Executor v. McCay is a United States Supreme Court case from 1883. The case involved a dispute between the executor of a deceased man's estate and the deceased man's widow. The executor argued that the widow was not entitled to a portion of the estate, as the deceased man had made a will that excluded her from receiving any of the estate. The widow argued that the will was invalid, as it had been made under duress. The Supreme Court ultimately sided with the executor, ruling that the will was valid and that the widow was not entitled to any portion of the estate. The Court reasoned that the will was valid because the deceased man had been of sound mind when he made it, and that the widow had not provided sufficient evidence to prove that the will had been made under duress. The Court also noted that the deceased man had made the will in accordance with the laws of the state in which he resided. As such, the Court held that the will was valid and that the widow was not entitled to any portion of the estate.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In Lamar, Executor v. McCay (1883), the Supreme Court was asked to decide whether a contract between two parties could be enforced after one of them had died. The majority opinion held that such contracts were not enforceable because they violated public policy and would undermine the sanctity of wills and testamentary dispositions. However, in his dissenting opinion Justice Field argued that there was no legal basis for denying enforcement of these types of contracts simply because one party had passed away. He reasoned that if both parties had agreed to certain terms while alive then those terms should still be binding even after death; otherwise it would lead to an unjust result where one party’s rights are disregarded due solely to their passing away before the other party fulfilled their obligations under the agreement. Furthermore, he noted that enforcing such agreements did not necessarily conflict with public policy since courts have long recognized contractual arrangements made by decedents as valid and enforceable when appropriate circumstances exist.

Opinion written by Justice SBlatchford
Decided: Nov 19, 1883
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms