Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Lawrence County Et Al. v. Lead-deadwood School District No. 40-1

• 1984 • 469 U.S. 256 • Burger Court
In the 1984 case of Lawrence County et al. v. Lead-Deadwood School District No. 40-1, the U.S Supreme Court ruled on a dispute over tax revenue allocation from federal mining leases in South Dakota's Black Hills region. The county had been distributing these funds to its school districts based on their respective student populations, but this was challenged by one district that argued it should receive more due to its location within the mineral-rich area where mining operations were taking...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Burger Court
Term: 1984
Docket: 83-240
469 U.S. 256
105 S. Ct. 695
83 L. Ed. 2d 635
1985 U.S. LEXIS 37
Argued: Oct 30, 1984

Lawrence County Et Al. v. Lead-deadwood School District No. 40-1

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the 1984 case of Lawrence County et al. v. Lead-Deadwood School District No. 40-1, the U.S Supreme Court ruled on a dispute over tax revenue allocation from federal mining leases in South Dakota's Black Hills region. The county had been distributing these funds to its school districts based on their respective student populations, but this was challenged by one district that argued it should receive more due to its location within the mineral-rich area where mining operations were taking place. The court held that under federal law (the Mineral Lands Leasing Act), states have discretion in allocating such revenues and are not required to distribute them solely according to geographic proximity or impact from mining activities; thus, they upheld the county's distribution method as lawful.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for Lawrence County et al. v. Lead-Deadwood School District No. 40-1, Justice White disagreed with the majority's interpretation of South Dakota law and its application to this case. He argued that the state statute did not intend to provide a windfall for school districts at the expense of other local governmental entities when it came to sharing tax revenues from federal mineral leases. Instead, he believed that these funds should be distributed in proportion to each entity's share of total property taxes levied within their jurisdictional boundaries as intended by South Dakota lawmakers when they enacted legislation on this issue in 1975 and amended it in 1982.

Opinion written by Justice BRWhite
Decided: Jan 09, 1985
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcript
Argued: Oct 05, 2026
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms