Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Alexis Lawrence, Guardian And Next Friend On Behalf Of Kemmerlyn D. Lawrence, A Minor v. Shirley S. Chater, Commissioner Of Social Security

• 1995 • 516 U.S. 163 • Rehnquist Court
In the case of Alexis Lawrence, guardian and next friend on behalf of Kemmerlyn D. Lawrence, a minor v. Shirley S. Chater, Commissioner of Social Security in 1995, the Supreme Court was asked to consider whether or not a child who is conceived after the death of her father but born within nine months can qualify for survivor's benefits under social security law. The court ruled that such children are eligible for benefits if they meet state inheritance laws where their deceased parent lived at...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Rehnquist Court
Term: 1995
Docket: 94-9323
516 U.S. 163
116 S. Ct. 604
133 L. Ed. 2d 545
1996 U.S. LEXIS 10

Alexis Lawrence, Guardian And Next Friend On Behalf Of Kemmerlyn D. Lawrence, A Minor v. Shirley S. Chater, Commissioner Of Social Security

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of Alexis Lawrence, guardian and next friend on behalf of Kemmerlyn D. Lawrence, a minor v. Shirley S. Chater, Commissioner of Social Security in 1995, the Supreme Court was asked to consider whether or not a child who is conceived after the death of her father but born within nine months can qualify for survivor's benefits under social security law. The court ruled that such children are eligible for benefits if they meet state inheritance laws where their deceased parent lived at time of death; this includes cases where posthumous conception occurred through artificial insemination with stored sperm from deceased father. This ruling clarified an area previously left ambiguous by existing legislation and set precedent for future similar cases.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

The case does not provide information on a dissenting opinion. The Supreme Court's decision was unanimous, and no justice issued a dissenting opinion.

Opinion written by Justice
Decided: Jan 08, 1996
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms