Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Lawson, Deputy Commissioner, United States Employees' Compensation Commission, v. Suwannee Fruit & Steamship Co. Et Al.

• 1948 • 336 U.S. 198 • Vinson Court
In the 1948 case of Lawson, Deputy Commissioner, United States Employees' Compensation Commission v. Suwannee Fruit & Steamship Co., the Supreme Court ruled on a dispute involving workers’ compensation for maritime employees. The issue at hand was whether an injury sustained by a longshoreman while working aboard a ship in navigable waters fell under state or federal jurisdiction for purposes of workers' compensation claims. The court held that such injuries were within federal jurisdiction as...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Vinson Court
Term: 1948
Docket: 56
336 U.S. 198
69 S. Ct. 503
93 L. Ed. 2d 611
1949 U.S. LEXIS 2931
Argued: Dec 07, 1948

Lawson, Deputy Commissioner, United States Employees' Compensation Commission, v. Suwannee Fruit & Steamship Co. Et Al.

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the 1948 case of Lawson, Deputy Commissioner, United States Employees' Compensation Commission v. Suwannee Fruit & Steamship Co., the Supreme Court ruled on a dispute involving workers’ compensation for maritime employees. The issue at hand was whether an injury sustained by a longshoreman while working aboard a ship in navigable waters fell under state or federal jurisdiction for purposes of workers' compensation claims. The court held that such injuries were within federal jurisdiction as per the Longshoremen's and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act (LHWCA). This decision clarified that LHWCA applied to all injuries occurring upon navigable waters of the U.S., regardless if it occurred during employment connected with navigation or not. Therefore, even though Mr. Davis was injured while performing duties related to loading cargo onto ships – traditionally considered state-regulated work – his claim should have been processed under federal law.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for Lawson v. Suwannee Fruit & Steamship Co., Justice Frankfurter disagreed with the majority's interpretation of the Longshoremen's and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act, arguing that it was not intended to cover injuries sustained on navigable waters outside a state’s territorial jurisdiction. He believed that Congress had deliberately limited its scope to avoid constitutional issues related to federalism and states’ rights. Furthermore, he argued that if Congress had intended such broad coverage, they would have explicitly stated so in the legislation. Therefore, he concluded that Mr. Calbeck’s injury did not fall under this act as it occurred while his ship was on navigable waters beyond Texas’s jurisdictional boundaries.

Opinion written by Justice FMurphy
Decided: Feb 14, 1949
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms