Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Leary v. The Mayor And Aldermen Of The City Of Jersey City, Et Al.

• 1918 • 248 U.S. 328 • White Court
In the case of Leary v. The Mayor and Aldermen of the City of Jersey City, et al., 1918, plaintiff John J. Leary Jr., a civil service employee in Jersey City, New Jersey was dismissed from his position without any charges being filed against him or having an opportunity to defend himself. He sued for reinstatement arguing that his dismissal violated due process rights under the Fourteenth Amendment as he was not given notice or hearing before termination. However, the Supreme Court ruled...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief White Court
Term: 1918
Docket: 3
248 U.S. 328
39 S. Ct. 115
63 L. Ed. 271
1919 U.S. LEXIS 2316
Argued: Nov 12, 1918

Leary v. The Mayor And Aldermen Of The City Of Jersey City, Et Al.

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of Leary v. The Mayor and Aldermen of the City of Jersey City, et al., 1918, plaintiff John J. Leary Jr., a civil service employee in Jersey City, New Jersey was dismissed from his position without any charges being filed against him or having an opportunity to defend himself. He sued for reinstatement arguing that his dismissal violated due process rights under the Fourteenth Amendment as he was not given notice or hearing before termination. However, the Supreme Court ruled against him stating that public employment is not a property right protected by due process clause and thus can be terminated at will by employers unless otherwise specified in an employment contract or statute.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

The dissenting opinion in the case of Leary v. The Mayor and Aldermen of the City of Jersey City, et al., argued that there was no violation of due process or equal protection under the law. It contended that a city has every right to regulate its streets and sidewalks for public safety purposes, including limiting where vendors can sell their goods. This regulation does not infringe upon any constitutional rights as it is within the city's police power to ensure order and protect its citizens' welfare. Furthermore, it stated that if a vendor feels aggrieved by such regulations, they should seek redress through political means rather than judicial ones - by lobbying for changes in local laws or electing officials who share their views on street vending policies.

Opinion written by Justice MPitney
Decided: Jan 07, 1919
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms