Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Leggett v. Standard Oil Company

• 1892 • 149 U.S. 287 • Fuller Court
In the 1892 case of Leggett v. Standard Oil Company, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in favor of Standard Oil, dismissing a claim brought by William Leggett who alleged that he was cheated out of his share in an oil business partnership with John D. Rockefeller and others which later became part of Standard Oil Company. The court found no evidence to support Leggett's claims that he had been defrauded or deceived into selling his shares at a price below their true value due to fraudulent...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Fuller Court
Term: 1892
Docket: 225
149 U.S. 287
13 S. Ct. 902
37 L. Ed. 737
1893 U.S. LEXIS 2301
Argued: Apr 20, 1893

Leggett v. Standard Oil Company

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the 1892 case of Leggett v. Standard Oil Company, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in favor of Standard Oil, dismissing a claim brought by William Leggett who alleged that he was cheated out of his share in an oil business partnership with John D. Rockefeller and others which later became part of Standard Oil Company. The court found no evidence to support Leggett's claims that he had been defrauded or deceived into selling his shares at a price below their true value due to fraudulent misrepresentations made by Rockefeller and other partners about the financial status and prospects of the company. Instead, it held that any losses suffered by Leggett were attributable to his own decisions and actions rather than any wrongdoing on the part of Rockefeller or other defendants.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for Leggett v. Standard Oil Company, it was argued that the majority's decision to uphold a New Jersey law prohibiting out-of-state corporations from doing business in New Jersey unless they had an office and agent within the state was incorrect. The dissent contended that this law violated both the Commerce Clause of the U.S Constitution, which gives Congress exclusive power over interstate commerce, and also infringed upon corporate rights under Fourteenth Amendment protections. They believed that by requiring out-of-state corporations to maintain an office and agent in New Jersey as a condition of conducting business there, it placed undue burden on these entities thus obstructing free trade among states. Furthermore, they held that such laws were discriminatory against non-resident businesses thereby violating their equal protection rights under Fourteenth Amendment.

Opinion written by Justice HEJackson
Decided: May 10, 1893
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms