Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Lehman, Secretary Of The Navy v. Nakshian

• 1980 • 453 U.S. 156 • Burger Court
In Lehman, Secretary of the Navy v. Nakshian (1980), the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that federal government agencies are not required to go through a jury trial in civil cases under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA). The case was brought by Mrs. Louise Nakshian who alleged age discrimination against her employer, the Department of Navy. She requested a jury trial as part of her lawsuit but this request was denied by lower courts on grounds that sovereign immunity protected...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Burger Court
Term: 1980
Docket: 80-242
453 U.S. 156
101 S. Ct. 2698
69 L. Ed. 2d 548
1981 U.S. LEXIS 37
Argued: Mar 31, 1981

Lehman, Secretary Of The Navy v. Nakshian

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In Lehman, Secretary of the Navy v. Nakshian (1980), the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that federal government agencies are not required to go through a jury trial in civil cases under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA). The case was brought by Mrs. Louise Nakshian who alleged age discrimination against her employer, the Department of Navy. She requested a jury trial as part of her lawsuit but this request was denied by lower courts on grounds that sovereign immunity protected federal agencies from such trials unless explicitly waived by Congress. On appeal, the Supreme Court upheld these rulings stating that while ADEA does provide for jury trials against private employers, it does not expressly waive sovereign immunity for government employers and thus they cannot be subjected to jury trials without their consent.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for Lehman, Secretary of the Navy v. Nakshian, Justice Brennan argued that Congress intended to grant jury trials in age discrimination cases when it passed the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA). He pointed out that while there is no explicit provision for a jury trial within ADEA itself, its legislative history and context suggest an intention to provide such rights. The majority's interpretation would mean that federal employees have fewer legal protections than their private sector counterparts - something he believed was inconsistent with Congressional intent. Furthermore, Brennan noted that denying a right to a jury trial could discourage victims of age discrimination from pursuing their claims due to fears about potential bias or prejudice from judges who are themselves often older individuals.

Opinion written by Justice PStewart
Decided: Jun 26, 1981
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcript
Argued: Oct 05, 2026
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms