Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Lehnhausen, Director, Department Of Local Government Affairs Of Illinois v. Lake Shore Auto Parts Co. Et Al.

• 1972 • 410 U.S. 356 • Burger Court
In the 1972 case Lehnhausen v. Lake Shore Auto Parts Co., the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in favor of Illinois' Director of Department of Local Government Affairs, upholding a state tax law that was challenged by corporations as discriminatory and violating equal protection rights under the Fourteenth Amendment. The law imposed a personal property tax on corporations but exempted individuals from this tax. The court held that states have broad powers to levy taxes and can make distinctions between...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Burger Court
Term: 1972
Docket: 71-685
410 U.S. 356
93 S. Ct. 1001
35 L. Ed. 2d 351
1973 U.S. LEXIS 135
Argued: Jan 15, 1973

Lehnhausen, Director, Department Of Local Government Affairs Of Illinois v. Lake Shore Auto Parts Co. Et Al.

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the 1972 case Lehnhausen v. Lake Shore Auto Parts Co., the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in favor of Illinois' Director of Department of Local Government Affairs, upholding a state tax law that was challenged by corporations as discriminatory and violating equal protection rights under the Fourteenth Amendment. The law imposed a personal property tax on corporations but exempted individuals from this tax. The court held that states have broad powers to levy taxes and can make distinctions between different types of taxpayers if there is a rational basis for doing so. In this case, it found that Illinois had valid reasons for treating corporate property differently than individual property because corporations benefit more from government services and protections than individuals do.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for Lehnhausen v. Lake Shore Auto Parts Co., Justice Douglas argued that the majority's decision to uphold Illinois' tax classification system was inconsistent with previous rulings on equal protection under the Fourteenth Amendment. He contended that there was no rational basis for treating personal property owned by corporations differently from similar property owned by individuals or partnerships, and thus it violated principles of equality. Furthermore, he criticized the court's deference to state legislatures in matters of taxation as an abdication of its responsibility to enforce constitutional protections against arbitrary discrimination. In his view, this case represented a departure from established jurisprudence and threatened to undermine fundamental rights.

Opinion written by Justice WODouglas
Decided: Feb 22, 1973
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms