Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Lemke, As Attorney General Of The State Of North Dakota, Et Al. v. Farmers Grain Company Of Embden, North Dakota

• 1921 • 258 U.S. 50 • Taft Court
In the case of Lemke, as Attorney General of the State of North Dakota, et al. v. Farmers Grain Company of Embden, North Dakota (1921), the U.S Supreme Court ruled in favor of Farmers Grain Company. The court found that a state law which allowed a state commission to set maximum prices for services provided by grain elevators was unconstitutional because it violated due process rights under the Fourteenth Amendment and interfered with interstate commerce. The decision upheld that states cannot...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Taft Court
Term: 1921
Docket: 456
258 U.S. 50
42 S. Ct. 244
66 L. Ed. 458
1922 U.S. LEXIS 2238
Argued: Nov 14, 1921

Lemke, As Attorney General Of The State Of North Dakota, Et Al. v. Farmers Grain Company Of Embden, North Dakota

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of Lemke, as Attorney General of the State of North Dakota, et al. v. Farmers Grain Company of Embden, North Dakota (1921), the U.S Supreme Court ruled in favor of Farmers Grain Company. The court found that a state law which allowed a state commission to set maximum prices for services provided by grain elevators was unconstitutional because it violated due process rights under the Fourteenth Amendment and interfered with interstate commerce. The decision upheld that states cannot regulate rates charged by businesses involved in interstate commerce unless such regulation is authorized by Congress or does not interfere with interstate trade.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

The dissenting opinion in the case of Lemke v. Farmers Grain Company argued that the North Dakota law, which regulated grain elevators and mills, did not violate due process or equal protection clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment. The justices believed that states have a right to regulate businesses within their borders for public welfare purposes. They contended that it was within North Dakota's power to establish regulations on grain storage charges as long as they were reasonable and non-discriminatory. Furthermore, they disagreed with the majority's view that this regulation interfered with interstate commerce since it only affected intrastate business operations; hence there was no violation of federal jurisdiction over interstate commerce matters.

Opinion written by Justice WRDay
Decided: Feb 27, 1922
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms