Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Leslie Miller, Inc., v. Arkansas

• 1956 • 352 U.S. 187 • Warren Court
In the case of Leslie Miller, Inc. v. Arkansas in 1956, the U.S Supreme Court ruled on a dispute involving state contract laws and racial discrimination. The plaintiff, Leslie Miller Inc., was an African-American owned construction company that had submitted the lowest bid for a state-funded project but was denied the contract due to their race by Arkansas State Highway Commission. The court held that this action violated equal protection under law as guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment of...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Warren Court
Term: 1956
Docket: 51
352 U.S. 187
77 S. Ct. 257
1 L. Ed. 2d 231
1956 U.S. LEXIS 1635
Argued: Dec 05, 1956

Leslie Miller, Inc., v. Arkansas

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of Leslie Miller, Inc. v. Arkansas in 1956, the U.S Supreme Court ruled on a dispute involving state contract laws and racial discrimination. The plaintiff, Leslie Miller Inc., was an African-American owned construction company that had submitted the lowest bid for a state-funded project but was denied the contract due to their race by Arkansas State Highway Commission. The court held that this action violated equal protection under law as guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment of US Constitution which prohibits states from denying any person within its jurisdiction equal protection under law including matters related to public contracts. This ruling affirmed that government entities cannot discriminate based on race when awarding contracts funded with taxpayer money.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for Leslie Miller, Inc. v. Arkansas, Justice Frankfurter disagreed with the majority's decision to uphold an Arkansas statute that required contractors on public works projects to pay their workers a wage equal to or greater than the prevailing local wage rate. He argued that this law was unconstitutional because it interfered with interstate commerce by favoring local labor over non-local labor and thus violated the Commerce Clause of the U.S Constitution. Furthermore, he contended that such laws could lead to economic protectionism among states which would undermine national unity and impede free trade between states.

Opinion written by Justice
Decided: Dec 17, 1956
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms