Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Liberty Warehouse Company v. Burley Tobacco Growers' Co-operative Marketing Association

• 1927 • 276 U.S. 71 • Taft Court
In the case of Liberty Warehouse Company v. Burley Tobacco Growers' Co-operative Marketing Association, the Supreme Court ruled in 1927 that a Kentucky law allowing tobacco growers to form cooperative associations did not violate antitrust laws. The Liberty Warehouse Company had argued that the Burley Tobacco Growers' Co-operative Marketing Association was monopolizing trade and restricting competition by controlling a large portion of tobacco sales in Kentucky. However, the court found that...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Taft Court
Term: 1927
Docket: 18
276 U.S. 71
48 S. Ct. 291
72 L. Ed. 473
1928 U.S. LEXIS 62
Argued: Feb 23, 1927

Liberty Warehouse Company v. Burley Tobacco Growers' Co-operative Marketing Association

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of Liberty Warehouse Company v. Burley Tobacco Growers' Co-operative Marketing Association, the Supreme Court ruled in 1927 that a Kentucky law allowing tobacco growers to form cooperative associations did not violate antitrust laws. The Liberty Warehouse Company had argued that the Burley Tobacco Growers' Co-operative Marketing Association was monopolizing trade and restricting competition by controlling a large portion of tobacco sales in Kentucky. However, the court found that this arrangement was permissible under state law and did not constitute an unreasonable restraint on trade as defined by federal antitrust legislation. The decision upheld farmers’ rights to organize cooperatives for marketing their products without violating anti-monopoly laws.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for Liberty Warehouse Company v. Burley Tobacco Growers' Co-operative Marketing Association, Justice Stone argued that the Kentucky statute did not violate the Fourteenth Amendment's due process clause as it was a valid exercise of state police power to protect and promote agricultural interests. He contended that there was no unreasonable interference with contractual freedom or property rights since tobacco growers were free to join or leave cooperative associations at will. Furthermore, he believed that warehousemen were not deprived of their liberty or property without due process because they could still operate independently outside these cooperatives if they chose to do so. The law merely regulated how warehouses interacted with such cooperatives in order to prevent potential abuses and exploitation of farmers by monopolistic entities.

Opinion written by Justice JCMcReynolds
Decided: Feb 20, 1928
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms