Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Aaron Lindh v. James P. Murphy, Warden

• 1996 • 521 U.S. 320 • Rehnquist Court
In the case of Aaron Lindh v. James P. Murphy, Warden (1996), Lindh was convicted for murder and attempted robbery in Indiana state court and sentenced to 40 years imprisonment without parole eligibility until half his sentence had been served. He filed a federal habeas corpus petition claiming that he was denied effective assistance of counsel because his attorney failed to object when the trial judge instructed the jury on an incorrect legal standard regarding intent, which violated his Sixth...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Rehnquist Court
Term: 1996
Docket: 96-6298
521 U.S. 320
117 S. Ct. 2059
138 L. Ed. 2d 481
1997 U.S. LEXIS 3998
Argued: Apr 14, 1997

Aaron Lindh v. James P. Murphy, Warden

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of Aaron Lindh v. James P. Murphy, Warden (1996), Lindh was convicted for murder and attempted robbery in Indiana state court and sentenced to 40 years imprisonment without parole eligibility until half his sentence had been served. He filed a federal habeas corpus petition claiming that he was denied effective assistance of counsel because his attorney failed to object when the trial judge instructed the jury on an incorrect legal standard regarding intent, which violated his Sixth Amendment rights. The District Court dismissed this claim as procedurally defaulted since it hadn't been raised during state proceedings. The Seventh Circuit affirmed this decision stating that procedural default could only be excused if there's cause for failure to comply with state procedure and actual prejudice resulted from alleged violation of federal law. However, Supreme Court reversed these decisions arguing that ineffective assistance claims constitute "cause" excusing procedural default if they're first presented in federal habeas proceedings rather than at trial or on direct review; thus remanding case back down for further consideration.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

The dissenting opinion in the case of Aaron Lindh v. James P. Murphy, Warden argued that the majority's interpretation of the Anti-Terrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (AEDPA) was incorrect. The dissent believed that Congress intended for AEDPA to apply to all cases pending on or after its enactment date, not just those filed afterwards as determined by the majority. They pointed out that this interpretation would lead to unequal treatment of habeas corpus petitioners depending solely on when they filed their petitions relative to AEDPA’s effective date - a result they deemed arbitrary and unfair. Furthermore, they contended that there were no clear indications from Congress suggesting such an intention; instead, it seemed more likely based on legislative history and statutory language that Congress meant for AEDPA provisions to apply immediately upon enactment without exception.

Opinion written by Justice DHSouter
Decided: Jun 23, 1997
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcript
Argued: Oct 05, 2026
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms