Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Linn v. United Plant Guard Workers Of America, Local 114, Et Al.

• 1965 • 383 U.S. 53 • Warren Court
In the case of Linn v. United Plant Guard Workers of America, Local 114, et al., the Supreme Court ruled that federal courts have jurisdiction over cases involving libelous statements made during labor disputes under Section 301(a) of the Labor Management Relations Act (LMRA). The plaintiff, Robert Linn, was a manager at Pinkerton's Inc., who claimed he had been defamed by false accusations from union members stating he committed acts of violence against them. The court held that while unions...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Warren Court
Term: 1965
Docket: 45
383 U.S. 53
86 S. Ct. 657
15 L. Ed. 2d 582
1966 U.S. LEXIS 2846
Argued: Nov 18, 1965

Linn v. United Plant Guard Workers Of America, Local 114, Et Al.

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of Linn v. United Plant Guard Workers of America, Local 114, et al., the Supreme Court ruled that federal courts have jurisdiction over cases involving libelous statements made during labor disputes under Section 301(a) of the Labor Management Relations Act (LMRA). The plaintiff, Robert Linn, was a manager at Pinkerton's Inc., who claimed he had been defamed by false accusations from union members stating he committed acts of violence against them. The court held that while unions and their members are allowed some leeway in making derogatory remarks about management during labor disputes due to "the heat of such controversies," they can be held liable for maliciously spreading damaging falsehoods. However, it also established a higher standard for proving malice in these situations than is typically required in other defamation suits - plaintiffs must show not only that the statement was untrue but also that it was made with knowledge or reckless disregard as to its falsity.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for Linn v. United Plant Guard Workers of America, Local 114, Justice Black argued that federal courts should not have jurisdiction over libel cases arising from labor disputes because such matters are more appropriately handled by state courts. He believed that Congress intended to leave regulation of defamatory statements in labor disputes largely to the states when it passed the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA). Furthermore, he contended that extending federal jurisdiction could potentially infringe upon First Amendment rights as it might discourage robust debate and free expression within labor unions. In his view, this case did not present a significant threat to industrial peace warranting federal intervention; rather it was essentially a personal dispute between individuals which had little impact on broader labor relations or interstate commerce. Therefore, he disagreed with majority's decision allowing plaintiff to pursue damages under federal law for malicious libel during a union organizing campaign.

Opinion written by Justice TCClark
Decided: Feb 21, 1966
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms