Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Locke v. New Orleans

• 1866 • 71 U.S. 172 • Chase Court
Locke v. New Orleans was a United States Supreme Court case that was decided in 1866. The case involved a dispute between the City of New Orleans and a group of African-American citizens who had been denied the right to purchase property in the city. The African-American citizens argued that the city's ordinance, which prohibited them from purchasing property, violated the Thirteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution, which abolished slavery. The Supreme Court agreed with the...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Chase Court
Term: 1866
71 U.S. 172
18 L. Ed. 334
1866 U.S. LEXIS 866

Locke v. New Orleans

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

Locke v. New Orleans was a United States Supreme Court case that was decided in 1866. The case involved a dispute between the City of New Orleans and a group of African-American citizens who had been denied the right to purchase property in the city. The African-American citizens argued that the city's ordinance, which prohibited them from purchasing property, violated the Thirteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution, which abolished slavery. The Supreme Court agreed with the African-American citizens, ruling that the ordinance was unconstitutional and that the city had violated the Thirteenth Amendment. The Court also held that the ordinance was a form of racial discrimination and that it violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The Court's decision was a major victory for African-American citizens, as it established that they had the same rights as other citizens to purchase property. The decision also set a precedent for future cases involving racial discrimination.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In Locke v. New Orleans, the Supreme Court was asked to decide whether a Louisiana law that imposed a tax on all persons engaged in selling goods violated the Thirteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution. The majority opinion held that it did not violate the amendment because it applied equally to both citizens and non-citizens alike. Justice Field dissented from this decision, arguing that even though the law may have been applied equally to everyone, its purpose was still discriminatory as it targeted those who were engaging in commerce with African Americans or freedmen specifically. He argued that such laws should be considered unconstitutional under Section 1 of the Thirteenth Amendment which prohibits any form of involuntary servitude or peonage except for punishment for crime whereof one has been duly convicted. Furthermore, he noted how these types of taxes could lead to further discrimination against African Americans by making them unable to engage in certain forms of economic activity due their inability pay such taxes without suffering financial hardship.

Opinion written by Justice SJField
Decided: Jan 03, 1867
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms