Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Lone Star Gas Co. v. Texas Et Al.

• 1937 • 304 U.S. 224 • Hughes Court
In the case of Lone Star Gas Co. v. Texas et al., 1937, the U.S Supreme Court ruled on a dispute between Lone Star Gas Company and the state of Texas regarding taxation. The gas company argued that it was unconstitutional for Texas to impose an occupation tax on natural gas companies operating within its borders while exempting city-owned utilities from this same tax. The court found in favor of Texas, ruling that states have broad powers to levy taxes as they see fit and there is no...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Hughes Court
Term: 1937
Docket: 313
304 U.S. 224
58 S. Ct. 883
82 L. Ed. 1304
1938 U.S. LEXIS 1024
Argued: Mar 28, 1938

Lone Star Gas Co. v. Texas Et Al.

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of Lone Star Gas Co. v. Texas et al., 1937, the U.S Supreme Court ruled on a dispute between Lone Star Gas Company and the state of Texas regarding taxation. The gas company argued that it was unconstitutional for Texas to impose an occupation tax on natural gas companies operating within its borders while exempting city-owned utilities from this same tax. The court found in favor of Texas, ruling that states have broad powers to levy taxes as they see fit and there is no constitutional requirement for all businesses within a certain category to be taxed equally or at all. Therefore, it was not discriminatory or unfair for cities owning their own utilities to be exempted from such taxes because these entities serve public rather than private interests.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for Lone Star Gas Co. v. Texas et al., Justice McReynolds expressed concern that the majority's decision would lead to an overreach of state power at the expense of private businesses and property rights. He argued that Lone Star Gas Company, a Delaware corporation, was being unfairly targeted by Texas' regulatory laws simply because it operated pipelines in multiple states. According to him, this constituted discrimination against interstate commerce which is protected under federal law from undue burdens imposed by individual states. Furthermore, he disagreed with the majority's interpretation of "public utility," arguing that not all corporations providing public services should be subject to such stringent regulations as those applied to monopolies or entities holding exclusive franchises granted by a state government.

Opinion written by Justice CEHughes(2)
Decided: May 16, 1938
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms