Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Long Sault Development Company v. Call (As Successor Of Kennedy), As Treasurer Of The State Of New York

• 1916 • 242 U.S. 272 • White Court
In the case of Long Sault Development Company v. Call, as successor of Kennedy, as Treasurer of the State of New York in 1916, the Supreme Court dealt with a dispute over land ownership and taxation. The Long Sault Development Company owned islands in the St. Lawrence River that were created by its construction activities for power generation purposes. The state claimed it had never ceded title to these lands and therefore they remained public property subject to taxation by New York State. On...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief White Court
Term: 1916
Docket: 49
242 U.S. 272
37 S. Ct. 79
61 L. Ed. 294
1916 U.S. LEXIS 1518
Argued: Apr 14, 1916

Long Sault Development Company v. Call (As Successor Of Kennedy), As Treasurer Of The State Of New York

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of Long Sault Development Company v. Call, as successor of Kennedy, as Treasurer of the State of New York in 1916, the Supreme Court dealt with a dispute over land ownership and taxation. The Long Sault Development Company owned islands in the St. Lawrence River that were created by its construction activities for power generation purposes. The state claimed it had never ceded title to these lands and therefore they remained public property subject to taxation by New York State. On appeal from a lower court decision favoring the state's claim, Justice Holmes delivered an opinion affirming this judgment on behalf of a unanimous court. Holmes reasoned that even if there was ambiguity about whether or not these newly formed islands could be considered part of adjacent mainland properties already owned by Long Sault (and thus exempt from further taxation), any doubt should be resolved against private encroachment upon public territory given longstanding principles upholding sovereign rights over navigable waters and their beds. The ruling underscored how courts will typically interpret laws regarding natural resources conservatively so as not to diminish government control unless clear legislative intent can be shown otherwise.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for Long Sault Development Company v. Call, it was argued that New York State had no right to tax property owned by a corporation incorporated in another state and located on an Indian reservation within its borders. The dissenting justices believed that such taxation violated the U.S Constitution's Commerce Clause, which prohibits states from interfering with interstate commerce. They also pointed out that this case involved not just any land but one specifically exempted from taxation under federal law due to its status as an Indian reservation. Therefore, they contended that New York’s imposition of taxes on this property infringed upon federal jurisdiction over Native American affairs and contradicted established legal principles governing relations between states and federally recognized tribes.

Opinion written by Justice JHClarke
Decided: Dec 11, 1916
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms