Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Lorenzo Arteaga v. United States Court Of Appeals For The Ninth Circuit

• 1997 • 522 U.S. 446 • Rehnquist Court
In the case of Lorenzo Arteaga v. United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 1997, Lorenzo Arteaga was a Mexican citizen who had been residing in the U.S. illegally since 1979. He was convicted on drug charges and sentenced to prison in 1988 but continued to live in America after his release until he left voluntarily in 1993. Upon attempting re-entry into the U.S., he was denied due to his previous conviction and deportation proceedings were initiated against him. Arteaga argued...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Rehnquist Court
Term: 1997
Docket: 97-6749
522 U.S. 446
118 S. Ct. 903
139 L. Ed. 2d 892
1998 U.S. LEXIS 838

Lorenzo Arteaga v. United States Court Of Appeals For The Ninth Circuit

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of Lorenzo Arteaga v. United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 1997, Lorenzo Arteaga was a Mexican citizen who had been residing in the U.S. illegally since 1979. He was convicted on drug charges and sentenced to prison in 1988 but continued to live in America after his release until he left voluntarily in 1993. Upon attempting re-entry into the U.S., he was denied due to his previous conviction and deportation proceedings were initiated against him. Arteaga argued that he should be eligible for discretionary relief from deportation under Section 212(c) of Immigration and Nationality Act because at least seven years had passed between his admission as a lawful permanent resident (which occurred when he returned from a brief trip abroad) and commencement of deportation proceedings. The Supreme Court ruled against Arteaga stating that time spent unlawfully present before becoming an LPR cannot count towards satisfying this requirement; only those years lived legally can be considered toward eligibility for relief under section 212(c). The court held that allowing otherwise would reward illegal conduct by immigrants which is contrary to immigration law's purpose.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for Lorenzo Arteaga v. United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, Justice Stevens argued that the majority's decision was based on a misinterpretation of immigration law and its application to Mr. Arteaga's case. He contended that under existing laws, an alien who has been convicted of an aggravated felony should not be automatically barred from seeking discretionary relief from deportation if they can demonstrate exceptional circumstances warranting such relief. In his view, this interpretation is more consistent with Congress' intent when it enacted these laws and would better serve justice by allowing each case to be evaluated individually rather than applying a blanket rule denying all aliens in similar situations any chance at obtaining relief regardless of their personal circumstances or contributions to society.

Opinion written by Justice
Decided: Feb 23, 1998
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms