Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Louisiana v. New Orleans

• 1879 • 103 U.S. 521 • Waite Court
In Louisiana v. New Orleans, the Supreme Court of the United States was asked to decide whether the City of New Orleans had the right to levy taxes on property owned by the State of Louisiana. The State of Louisiana argued that the City of New Orleans had no authority to tax its property, as it was not within the City's jurisdiction. The Supreme Court held that the City of New Orleans did have the right to levy taxes on the State's property, as the City had the power to tax all property within...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Waite Court
Term: 1879
103 U.S. 521
26 L. Ed. 306
1880 U.S. LEXIS 2148

Louisiana v. New Orleans

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In Louisiana v. New Orleans, the Supreme Court of the United States was asked to decide whether the City of New Orleans had the right to levy taxes on property owned by the State of Louisiana. The State of Louisiana argued that the City of New Orleans had no authority to tax its property, as it was not within the City's jurisdiction. The Supreme Court held that the City of New Orleans did have the right to levy taxes on the State's property, as the City had the power to tax all property within its jurisdiction. The Court further held that the City's power to tax was not limited to property owned by individuals, but extended to property owned by the State as well. The Court also held that the City's power to tax was not limited to property located within the City's boundaries, but extended to property located outside the City's boundaries. The Court concluded that the City of New Orleans had the right to levy taxes on the State's property, and that the State of Louisiana had no right to challenge the City's authority to do so.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of Louisiana v. New Orleans, the Supreme Court was tasked with determining whether or not a state could be held liable for damages caused by its own negligence in failing to maintain and repair levees that had been built on public property. The majority opinion found that states are immune from such liability due to their sovereign immunity status, but Justice Field dissented. He argued that if a state is negligent in maintaining public works like levees, it should be held responsible for any resulting damage just as an individual would be under similar circumstances. Furthermore, he noted that this ruling would create an unfair situation where those who suffer losses due to government negligence have no recourse against the state responsible for causing them harm. In conclusion, Justice Field believed that states should not receive special treatment when it comes to liability issues and should instead face consequences just like any other party involved in civil litigation cases involving negligence or injury claims.

Opinion written by Justice MRWaite
Decided: Mar 14, 1881
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms