Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Louisiana v. New Orleans

• 1880 • 102 U.S. 203 • Waite Court
In Louisiana v. New Orleans, the Supreme Court of the United States was asked to decide whether the City of New Orleans had the right to levy taxes on property owned by the State of Louisiana. The State of Louisiana argued that the City of New Orleans had no authority to tax its property, as it was not within the City's jurisdiction. The Supreme Court held that the City of New Orleans did have the right to levy taxes on the State's property, as the City had the power to tax all property within...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Waite Court
Term: 1880
Docket: 767
102 U.S. 203
26 L. Ed. 132
1880 U.S. LEXIS 2025

Louisiana v. New Orleans

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In Louisiana v. New Orleans, the Supreme Court of the United States was asked to decide whether the City of New Orleans had the right to levy taxes on property owned by the State of Louisiana. The State of Louisiana argued that the City of New Orleans had no authority to tax its property, as it was not within the City's jurisdiction. The Supreme Court held that the City of New Orleans did have the right to levy taxes on the State's property, as the City had the power to tax all property within its jurisdiction. The Court further held that the City's power to tax was not limited to property owned by individuals, but extended to property owned by the State as well. The Court also held that the City's power to tax was not limited to property located within the City's boundaries, but extended to property located outside the City's boundaries. The Court concluded that the City of New Orleans had the right to levy taxes on the State's property, and that the State of Louisiana had no right to challenge the City's authority to do so.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of Louisiana v. New Orleans, the Supreme Court was asked to determine whether a state could be sued without its consent in federal court by another state or citizen of another state. The majority opinion held that states do not have immunity from being sued in federal court and can be subject to suit if they are found liable for damages caused by their actions. However, Justice Field dissented from this ruling on the grounds that it violated principles of sovereign immunity established under Article III Section 2 of the Constitution which provides that “the judicial power shall extend to controversies between two or more States” but does not provide any authority for suits against one State by citizens or other States. He argued further that allowing such suits would create an imbalance among states as some may become targets for litigation while others remain immune due to lack of resources necessary to defend themselves in court proceedings. As such, he concluded that Congress should pass legislation granting states immunity from lawsuits brought against them in federal courts unless expressly authorized by law.

Opinion written by Justice SJField
Decided: Nov 22, 1880
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms