Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company v. Higdon, Doing Business Under The Name Of Crescent Coal Company

• 1913 • 234 U.S. 592 • White Court
In the case of Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company v. Higdon, doing business under the name of Crescent Coal Company in 1913, the Supreme Court ruled on a dispute involving freight rates for coal transportation. The Crescent Coal Company had sued the railroad company for charging higher rates than those set by an agreement between both parties and sought to recover overcharges. The lower courts sided with Crescent Coal, but upon appeal to the Supreme Court, it was determined that while...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief White Court
Term: 1913
Docket: 322
234 U.S. 592
34 S. Ct. 948
58 L. Ed. 1484
1914 U.S. LEXIS 1111

Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company v. Higdon, Doing Business Under The Name Of Crescent Coal Company

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company v. Higdon, doing business under the name of Crescent Coal Company in 1913, the Supreme Court ruled on a dispute involving freight rates for coal transportation. The Crescent Coal Company had sued the railroad company for charging higher rates than those set by an agreement between both parties and sought to recover overcharges. The lower courts sided with Crescent Coal, but upon appeal to the Supreme Court, it was determined that while there was indeed an agreed-upon rate between both companies, this did not exempt them from changes made by state legislation or regulatory bodies such as Interstate Commerce Commission (ICC). Therefore, when ICC increased freight rates across all railroads due to economic conditions at that time - which led to L&N Railroad increasing their charges - they were within their rights and obligations under law despite any prior agreements with individual customers like Crescent Coal Co. Henceforth, Louisville & Nashville Railroad's actions were deemed lawful and compliant with federal regulations governing interstate commerce.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

The dissenting opinion in the case of Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company v. Higdon argued that the majority's decision was incorrect because it failed to consider the full implications of its ruling on interstate commerce. The dissenting justices believed that by allowing a state law to regulate rates for intrastate transportation, even when such transportation is part of an interstate journey, would disrupt and potentially harm national trade. They contended that this interpretation could lead to inconsistent regulations across states, creating confusion and inefficiency for businesses involved in interstate commerce. Furthermore, they expressed concern about potential conflicts between federal and state laws regarding rate regulation if each state were allowed to set their own rules independently from one another. Therefore, they disagreed with the majority's view that Kentucky had jurisdiction over setting rates for a portion of an interstate shipment within its borders.

Opinion written by Justice WRDay
Decided: Jun 22, 1914
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms