Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Lovell v. City Of Griffin

• 1937 • 303 U.S. 444 • Hughes Court
In the Lovell v. City of Griffin case in 1937, the U.S Supreme Court unanimously ruled that a city ordinance requiring individuals to obtain permission from the city manager before distributing literature violated First Amendment rights. The appellant, Alma Lovell, was convicted for violating this ordinance when she distributed religious pamphlets without prior approval. She appealed her conviction on grounds that it infringed upon her freedom of speech and press as protected by the...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Hughes Court
Term: 1937
Docket: 391
303 U.S. 444
58 S. Ct. 666
82 L. Ed. 949
1938 U.S. LEXIS 297
Argued: Feb 04, 1938

Lovell v. City Of Griffin

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the Lovell v. City of Griffin case in 1937, the U.S Supreme Court unanimously ruled that a city ordinance requiring individuals to obtain permission from the city manager before distributing literature violated First Amendment rights. The appellant, Alma Lovell, was convicted for violating this ordinance when she distributed religious pamphlets without prior approval. She appealed her conviction on grounds that it infringed upon her freedom of speech and press as protected by the Constitution's Fourteenth Amendment. The court agreed with Lovell’s argument stating that such an ordinance was unconstitutional because it allowed unchecked censorship power to one individual (the city manager) and restricted free expression indiscriminately rather than targeting specific abuses like libel or obscenity.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the Lovell v. City of Griffin case, there was no dissenting opinion recorded as the Supreme Court decision was unanimous. The court unanimously held that a city ordinance requiring permits for distributing literature violated First Amendment rights to freedom of speech and press. They ruled in favor of Alma Lovell who had been convicted by the city for distributing religious pamphlets without permission from the City Manager, stating that her conviction infringed upon her constitutional rights.

Opinion written by Justice CEHughes(2)
Decided: Mar 28, 1938
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms