Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Lynch, Executrix Of Lynch, Collector Of Internal Revenue, Deceased, v. Tilden Produce Company

• 1923 • 265 U.S. 315 • Taft Court
In the case of Lynch v. Tilden Produce Company in 1923, the Supreme Court ruled on a dispute regarding tax law. The Tilden Produce Company had paid an excess profits tax under protest and then sued for a refund, arguing that certain deductions should have been allowed which would have reduced their taxable income. The lower courts agreed with Tilden and ordered a refund to be issued by the Collector of Internal Revenue (Lynch). However, before this could occur, Lynch died and his executrix...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Taft Court
Term: 1923
Docket: 139
265 U.S. 315
44 S. Ct. 488
68 L. Ed. 1034
1924 U.S. LEXIS 2609
Argued: Jan 25, 1924

Lynch, Executrix Of Lynch, Collector Of Internal Revenue, Deceased, v. Tilden Produce Company

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of Lynch v. Tilden Produce Company in 1923, the Supreme Court ruled on a dispute regarding tax law. The Tilden Produce Company had paid an excess profits tax under protest and then sued for a refund, arguing that certain deductions should have been allowed which would have reduced their taxable income. The lower courts agreed with Tilden and ordered a refund to be issued by the Collector of Internal Revenue (Lynch). However, before this could occur, Lynch died and his executrix appealed to the Supreme Court. The main issue was whether or not interest accrued on government bonds owned by Tilden should be included as part of its gross income for taxation purposes. The court held that it should not because such interest is exempt from federal taxation under U.S law. Additionally, they addressed whether losses incurred due to selling property below cost price can be deducted from gross income when calculating taxes owed; again siding with Tilden's argument that these losses are deductible expenses. Thusly ruling in favor of the company over both issues led them affirming lower court decisions ordering refunds for excessive taxes collected.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for Lynch v. Tilden Produce Company, Justice Holmes argued that the majority's decision was inconsistent with previous rulings of the court and failed to properly interpret tax law. He contended that a taxpayer should not be allowed to deduct losses from their income if those losses were covered by insurance, as this would amount to double recovery. In his view, allowing such deductions would undermine the purpose of taxation and unfairly benefit certain taxpayers at the expense of others. Furthermore, he disagreed with the majority's interpretation of "realized" loss in relation to insurance payments received after a taxable year had ended but before filing taxes for that year. According to him, these payments should be considered part of gross income in order to accurately reflect financial reality rather than relying on arbitrary timelines set by tax laws.

Opinion written by Justice PButler
Decided: May 26, 1924
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms