Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Mackay Telegraph & Cable Company v. City Of Little Rock

• 1918 • 250 U.S. 94 • White Court
The U.S. Supreme Court case Mackay Telegraph & Cable Company v. City of Little Rock in 1918 revolved around the issue of whether a city could impose an occupation tax on a telegraph company that was operating under federal license and whose lines extended beyond state boundaries. The court ruled in favor of the City of Little Rock, stating that it had the right to levy such taxes as long as they did not interfere with interstate commerce or discriminate against out-of-state entities. The...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief White Court
Term: 1918
Docket: 374
250 U.S. 94
39 S. Ct. 428
63 L. Ed. 863
1919 U.S. LEXIS 1719

Mackay Telegraph & Cable Company v. City Of Little Rock

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

The U.S. Supreme Court case Mackay Telegraph & Cable Company v. City of Little Rock in 1918 revolved around the issue of whether a city could impose an occupation tax on a telegraph company that was operating under federal license and whose lines extended beyond state boundaries. The court ruled in favor of the City of Little Rock, stating that it had the right to levy such taxes as long as they did not interfere with interstate commerce or discriminate against out-of-state entities. The decision upheld the principle that local governments can exercise their taxing power over businesses within their jurisdiction, even if those businesses are engaged in interstate commerce or operate under federal licenses.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for Mackay Telegraph & Cable Company v. City of Little Rock, it was argued that the city's ordinance requiring a franchise to operate telegraph lines within its limits is not in conflict with federal law or constitution. The dissent emphasized that states have inherent power over their streets and public places, which includes granting franchises for use of these spaces by utilities like telegraph companies. It was also pointed out that Congress has never attempted to regulate this area nor expressed any intention to do so, thus there should be no preemption issue at hand. Furthermore, it was contended that even if such regulation did exist on a federal level, local authorities would still retain concurrent jurisdiction unless explicitly denied by Congress - something which had not occurred here either.

Opinion written by Justice MPitney
Decided: May 19, 1919
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms