Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Joseph Mandeville, One Of The Firm Of Richard Slade & Co., Plaintiff In Error, Vs. George Holey And Thomas Suckley, Joint Merchants In Trade, Under The Firm Of Holey & Suckley, Defendants In Error

1828 • 26 U.S. 136 • Marshall Court
Joseph Mandeville, one of the firm of Richard Slade & Co., brought a case against George Holey and Thomas Suckley, joint merchants in trade under the firm of Holey & Suckley. The dispute was over an unpaid debt for goods sold by Richard Slade & Co. to Holey & Suckly. The Supreme Court found that there had been no breach on either side and that both parties were equally liable for any damages incurred due to non-payment or delay in payment. Furthermore, it was determined that as long as...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Marshall Court
Term: 1828
26 U.S. 136
7 L. Ed. 85
1828 U.S. LEXIS 396
Argued: Jan 18, 1828

Joseph Mandeville, One Of The Firm Of Richard Slade & Co., Plaintiff In Error, Vs. George Holey And Thomas Suckley, Joint Merchants In Trade, Under The Firm Of Holey & Suckley, Defendants In Error

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

Joseph Mandeville, one of the firm of Richard Slade & Co., brought a case against George Holey and Thomas Suckley, joint merchants in trade under the firm of Holey & Suckley. The dispute was over an unpaid debt for goods sold by Richard Slade & Co. to Holey & Suckly. The Supreme Court found that there had been no breach on either side and that both parties were equally liable for any damages incurred due to non-payment or delay in payment. Furthermore, it was determined that as long as reasonable efforts were made by each party to fulfill their obligations then neither could be held responsible for any losses suffered from delays or defaults in payments. This ruling set a precedent which has since been used when determining liability between two parties involved in commercial transactions where one is unable to pay its debts due to circumstances beyond its control.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of Joseph Mandeville, one of the firm Richard Slade & Co., vs. George Holey and Thomas Suckley, joint merchants in trade under the firm of Holey & Suckley, Justice Story delivered a dissenting opinion. He argued that although there was no express contract between parties to pay interest on money due for goods sold and delivered by them, yet it may be implied from circumstances attending such transactions. In this particular case he believed that an agreement had been made between both parties which included payment with interest at six percent per annum after sixty days if not paid before then. Furthermore he stated that even if there were no express or implied agreement as to interest payments being due upon defaulted payments then common law would allow for recovery of damages caused by nonpayment including reasonable compensation for loss occasioned by delay in payment. Therefore Justice Story concluded that plaintiff should have been allowed to recover damages from defendants based on their failure to make timely payments according to agreed terms or otherwise according to common law principles governing contracts involving sale and delivery of goods

Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms