Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Manufacturers' Finance Co. v. Mckey, Trustee In Bankruptcy

• 1934 • 294 U.S. 442 • Hughes Court
In the case of Manufacturers' Finance Co. v. McKey, Trustee in Bankruptcy (1934), the United States Supreme Court was tasked with determining whether a bankrupt company's trustee could recover payments made to a creditor within four months of bankruptcy if those payments were made while insolvent and preferred one creditor over others. The court ruled that under Section 60b of the Bankruptcy Act, such preferential transfers are voidable by the trustee if they occur within this time frame and...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Hughes Court
Term: 1934
Docket: 522
294 U.S. 442
55 S. Ct. 444
79 L. Ed. 982
1935 U.S. LEXIS 282
Argued: Feb 13, 1935

Manufacturers' Finance Co. v. Mckey, Trustee In Bankruptcy

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of Manufacturers' Finance Co. v. McKey, Trustee in Bankruptcy (1934), the United States Supreme Court was tasked with determining whether a bankrupt company's trustee could recover payments made to a creditor within four months of bankruptcy if those payments were made while insolvent and preferred one creditor over others. The court ruled that under Section 60b of the Bankruptcy Act, such preferential transfers are voidable by the trustee if they occur within this time frame and meet other specified conditions - namely, that they allow one creditor to receive more than their fair share compared to other creditors in similar situations. This decision reinforced principles of fairness among creditors during bankruptcy proceedings.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for Manufacturers' Finance Co. v. McKey, Trustee in Bankruptcy, Justice Stone argued that the majority's decision was inconsistent with previous rulings and legal principles regarding bankruptcy law. He contended that a debtor should not be allowed to prefer one creditor over another by transferring assets shortly before declaring bankruptcy, as this would undermine the equitable distribution of assets among all creditors - a fundamental principle of bankruptcy law. Furthermore, he disagreed with the majority's interpretation of "transfer" under Section 60b of the Bankruptcy Act and believed it should include any act which diminishes or depletes a debtor’s estate thereby reducing what is available for other creditors upon insolvency declaration. Thus, according to him, payments made by Manufacturers' Finance Company were indeed transfers subject to recovery by trustee in bankruptcy.

Opinion written by Justice GSutherland
Decided: Mar 04, 1935
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms