Opinion summary
Etalia.ai summary of the majority opinion
The case involved Marathon Oil Company challenging the United States government over a breach of contract related to oil and gas leases. The dispute arose when Congress enacted legislation that altered the terms under which companies could extract resources from federal lands, impacting existing contracts. Marathon argued this constituted an unlawful taking without just compensation, violating the Fifth Amendment. The Supreme Court held that while legislative changes can impact contractual agreements with private entities, they do not necessarily constitute a compensable taking unless it deprives all economically viable use of property or significantly interferes with reasonable investment-backed expectations. In this instance, the Court found no such deprivation occurred as alternative avenues for resource extraction remained available to Marathon.
Opinion written by Justice Breyer
Decided 26 Jun 2000 · Official report