Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Markham, Alien Property Custodian, v. Allen Et Al.

• 1945 • 326 U.S. 490 • Stone Court
In the 1945 case of Markham, Alien Property Custodian v. Allen et al., the U.S Supreme Court was tasked with determining whether a California court had jurisdiction to decide on an inheritance dispute involving property seized by the United States government during World War II under the Trading With The Enemy Act. The property in question belonged to a German national who died intestate (without a will) and his potential heirs were also German nationals. Under normal circumstances, they would...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Stone Court
Term: 1945
Docket: 60
326 U.S. 490
66 S. Ct. 296
90 L. Ed. 256
1946 U.S. LEXIS 2925
Argued: Dec 05, 1945

Markham, Alien Property Custodian, v. Allen Et Al.

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the 1945 case of Markham, Alien Property Custodian v. Allen et al., the U.S Supreme Court was tasked with determining whether a California court had jurisdiction to decide on an inheritance dispute involving property seized by the United States government during World War II under the Trading With The Enemy Act. The property in question belonged to a German national who died intestate (without a will) and his potential heirs were also German nationals. Under normal circumstances, they would have been entitled to inherit but due to wartime laws, their assets were confiscated by the US Government's Alien Property Custodian. The Supreme Court ruled that while state courts could determine heirship rights for purposes such as probate administration or estate tax assessment, they did not have jurisdiction over cases where federal law provided for vesting of enemy-owned property in an alien property custodian. It held that only federal courts could adjudicate claims against properties vested in this way because it involved interpretation and application of federal statutes related specifically to war powers.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for Markham, Alien Property Custodian v. Allen et al., Justice Frankfurter disagreed with the majority's interpretation of Section 9(a) of the Trading with Enemy Act. He argued that it was not intended to bar suits against an alien property custodian by American citizens seeking to establish their rights in seized property. Instead, he believed this section was designed only to protect custodians from being sued by enemy aliens whose assets had been confiscated during wartime. According to him, allowing U.S citizens who claim ownership over such properties should be able to challenge these seizures in court without violating the purpose or spirit of this law. Therefore, he contended that Mrs. Allen and other similarly situated individuals should have access to judicial review before their claims are denied outright based on administrative decisions made under potentially questionable circumstances.

Opinion written by Justice HFStone
Decided: Jan 07, 1946
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms