Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Marquette, Houghton, And Ontonagon Railroad Company v. United States

• 1887 • 123 U.S. 722 • Waite Court
Marquette, Houghton, and Ontonagon Railroad Company v. United States was a case heard by the United States Supreme Court in 1887. The case involved a dispute between the railroad company and the United States government over the right to use certain lands for the construction of a railroad. The railroad company argued that it had the right to use the lands under the terms of a contract between the company and the government. The government argued that the contract was invalid and that the...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Waite Court
Term: 1887
Docket: 99
123 U.S. 722
8 S. Ct. 319
31 L. Ed. 302
1887 U.S. LEXIS 2210
Argued: Dec 06, 1887

Marquette, Houghton, And Ontonagon Railroad Company v. United States

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

Marquette, Houghton, and Ontonagon Railroad Company v. United States was a case heard by the United States Supreme Court in 1887. The case involved a dispute between the railroad company and the United States government over the right to use certain lands for the construction of a railroad. The railroad company argued that it had the right to use the lands under the terms of a contract between the company and the government. The government argued that the contract was invalid and that the company had no right to use the lands. The Supreme Court ultimately sided with the government, ruling that the contract was invalid and that the company had no right to use the lands. The Court held that the contract was invalid because it was not authorized by Congress and was not in the public interest. The Court also held that the company had no right to use the lands because the government had not granted it permission to do so. The Court's decision was a major victory for the government and set a precedent for future cases involving the use of public lands.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In Marquette, Houghton, and Ontonagon Railroad Company v. United States, the Supreme Court was asked to decide whether a railroad company could be held liable for damages caused by its negligence in failing to properly maintain its tracks. The majority opinion of the court found that the railroad company was not liable because it had acted with reasonable care and diligence in maintaining its tracks. However, Justice Field dissented from this decision on two grounds: firstly, he argued that Congress had intended for railroads to be held strictly accountable for any damage they cause; secondly, he maintained that even if there were no statutory requirement of strict liability imposed upon railroads by Congress then common law should still apply which would hold them responsible regardless of their level of care or diligence exercised when maintaining their tracks. In conclusion Justice Field believed that either way the railroad company should have been held liable for damages caused due to their negligence in failing to properly maintain their tracks.

Opinion written by Justice MRWaite
Decided: Dec 19, 1887
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms