Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Mason v. Eldred Et Al.

• 1867 • 73 U.S. 231 • Chase Court
Mason v. Eldred et al. was a case heard by the United States Supreme Court in 1867. The case involved a dispute between two parties over a contract for the sale of a parcel of land in the state of Illinois. The plaintiff, Mason, had entered into a contract with the defendants, Eldred et al., to purchase the land for a certain sum of money. However, the defendants had failed to deliver the deed to the land as promised, and Mason sued for breach of contract. The Supreme Court held that the...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Chase Court
Term: 1867
73 U.S. 231
18 L. Ed. 783
1867 U.S. LEXIS 959
Argued: Dec 20, 1867

Mason v. Eldred Et Al.

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

Mason v. Eldred et al. was a case heard by the United States Supreme Court in 1867. The case involved a dispute between two parties over a contract for the sale of a parcel of land in the state of Illinois. The plaintiff, Mason, had entered into a contract with the defendants, Eldred et al., to purchase the land for a certain sum of money. However, the defendants had failed to deliver the deed to the land as promised, and Mason sued for breach of contract. The Supreme Court held that the contract was valid and enforceable, and that the defendants were liable for damages. The Court also held that the defendants had breached the contract by failing to deliver the deed, and that Mason was entitled to recover the purchase price of the land, plus interest and costs. The Court further held that the defendants were liable for any damages caused by their breach of contract. In conclusion, the Supreme Court held that Mason was entitled to recover the purchase price of the land, plus interest and costs, and that the defendants were liable for any damages caused by their breach of contract.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In Mason v. Eldred et al., the Supreme Court was asked to decide whether a state law that allowed for the sale of public lands in Iowa was constitutional. The majority opinion held that it was, but Justice Field dissented from this decision. He argued that Congress had exclusive authority over public lands and could not be divested of this power by any state legislature or court. He further noted that while states may have some control over their own internal affairs, they cannot pass laws which interfere with federal powers granted by the Constitution or acts of Congress passed pursuant thereto. As such, he concluded that the Iowa statute allowing for sales of public land violated both congressional authority and the Supremacy Clause of Article VI in the U.S Constitution because it interfered with Congressional power to dispose of its property as it saw fit without interference from any other branch or level government

Opinion written by Justice SJField
Decided: Jan 13, 1868
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms