Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

International Organization Of Masters, Mates & Pilots, Et Al. v. Timothy A. Brown

• 1990 • 498 U.S. 466 • Rehnquist Court
In the 1990 case of International Organization of Masters, Mates & Pilots v. Timothy A. Brown, the U.S Supreme Court ruled in favor of a union member who had been expelled from his union for crossing a picket line during a strike and subsequently sued to recover lost wages and benefits. The court held that under federal labor law, specifically Section 301(a) of the Labor Management Relations Act (LMRA), an individual has the right to sue their own union for damages resulting from wrongful...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Rehnquist Court
Term: 1990
Docket: 89-1330
498 U.S. 466
111 S. Ct. 880
112 L. Ed. 2d 991
1991 U.S. LEXIS 1141
Argued: Nov 27, 1990

International Organization Of Masters, Mates & Pilots, Et Al. v. Timothy A. Brown

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the 1990 case of International Organization of Masters, Mates & Pilots v. Timothy A. Brown, the U.S Supreme Court ruled in favor of a union member who had been expelled from his union for crossing a picket line during a strike and subsequently sued to recover lost wages and benefits. The court held that under federal labor law, specifically Section 301(a) of the Labor Management Relations Act (LMRA), an individual has the right to sue their own union for damages resulting from wrongful expulsion or suspension if it is proven that such actions were taken without fair procedures being followed by the Union's governing body. This ruling reinforced individuals' rights within unions and established important precedents regarding internal disciplinary procedures.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for International Organization of Masters, Mates & Pilots v. Timothy A. Brown, Justice Blackmun argued that the majority's decision was inconsistent with previous rulings and federal labor law principles. He contended that a union should not be held liable for breaching its duty of fair representation simply because it failed to inform an employee about a job opportunity when there is no evidence showing discriminatory or bad faith conduct by the union. The justice believed this ruling could potentially burden unions with excessive responsibilities and liabilities beyond what is reasonable or necessary under existing laws governing labor relations in America.

Opinion written by Justice JPStevens
Decided: Feb 20, 1991
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcript
Argued: Oct 05, 2026
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms