Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

May, As Trustee In Bankruptcy Of Geo. W. Cowen Co., Inc., Bankrupt, v. Henderson, Et Al.

• 1924 • 268 U.S. 111 • Taft Court
In the 1924 case May, as Trustee in Bankruptcy of Geo. W. Cowen Co., Inc., Bankrupt v. Henderson et al., the Supreme Court ruled on a dispute regarding bankruptcy law and its application to stock transfers made by an insolvent company prior to declaring bankruptcy. The bankrupt firm had transferred shares of its own stock to certain creditors before filing for bankruptcy, which was challenged by other creditors who argued that these transactions were fraudulent under Section 67e of the Federal...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Taft Court
Term: 1924
Docket: 126
268 U.S. 111
45 S. Ct. 456
69 L. Ed. 870
1925 U.S. LEXIS 833
Argued: Mar 05, 1925

May, As Trustee In Bankruptcy Of Geo. W. Cowen Co., Inc., Bankrupt, v. Henderson, Et Al.

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the 1924 case May, as Trustee in Bankruptcy of Geo. W. Cowen Co., Inc., Bankrupt v. Henderson et al., the Supreme Court ruled on a dispute regarding bankruptcy law and its application to stock transfers made by an insolvent company prior to declaring bankruptcy. The bankrupt firm had transferred shares of its own stock to certain creditors before filing for bankruptcy, which was challenged by other creditors who argued that these transactions were fraudulent under Section 67e of the Federal Bankruptcy Act because they occurred within four months preceding the filing for bankruptcy and while insolvent. The court held that such transfers could not be deemed fraudulent merely based on their timing or insolvency at time of transfer if there was no actual intent to defraud other creditors involved. It further clarified that shares owned by a corporation in itself have no value until distributed among shareholders upon dissolution; hence, transferring them does not diminish any asset value available for distribution among general creditors during liquidation proceedings post-bankruptcy declaration.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for May v. Henderson, Justice McReynolds disagreed with the majority's decision to allow a trustee in bankruptcy to recover payments made by an insolvent debtor prior to declaring bankruptcy. He argued that these payments were not fraudulent and should not be considered as such simply because they were made while the company was insolvent. According to him, there was no evidence of intent to defraud on part of either party involved in these transactions. Furthermore, he contended that allowing trustees in bankruptcy cases like this one would discourage creditors from accepting payment from struggling businesses out of fear it could later be reclaimed if insolvency is declared - potentially exacerbating financial difficulties for those businesses trying hard to avoid bankruptcy.

Opinion written by Justice HFStone
Decided: Apr 13, 1925
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms