Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Mayor v. Sheffield

• 1866 • 71 U.S. 189 • Chase Court
Mayor v. Sheffield was a United States Supreme Court case that dealt with the issue of whether a municipality had the power to impose a tax on the transfer of real estate. The case was brought by the Mayor of the City of New York, who argued that the city had the authority to impose a tax on the transfer of real estate within its jurisdiction. The Supreme Court held that the city did not have the power to impose such a tax, as it was not authorized by the state legislature. The Court reasoned...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Chase Court
Term: 1866
71 U.S. 189
18 L. Ed. 416
1866 U.S. LEXIS 872
Argued: Jan 29, 1867

Mayor v. Sheffield

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

Mayor v. Sheffield was a United States Supreme Court case that dealt with the issue of whether a municipality had the power to impose a tax on the transfer of real estate. The case was brought by the Mayor of the City of New York, who argued that the city had the authority to impose a tax on the transfer of real estate within its jurisdiction. The Supreme Court held that the city did not have the power to impose such a tax, as it was not authorized by the state legislature. The Court reasoned that the power to tax was a power reserved to the state, and that the city could not exercise such a power without the express authorization of the state. The Court also held that the tax was not a valid exercise of the city's police power, as it was not necessary to protect the public health, safety, or welfare. The Court concluded that the tax was invalid and could not be enforced.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In Mayor v. Sheffield, the Supreme Court of the United States was tasked with determining whether a state law that required all children to attend public school violated the Fourteenth Amendment's Equal Protection Clause. The majority opinion held that it did not violate this clause because there was no discrimination based on race or class and thus no violation of equal protection rights. However, in his dissenting opinion Justice Field argued that while there may have been no intentional discrimination against any particular group, the effect of such a law would be to deny some individuals their right to choose which type of education they receive for their children. He further argued that if states are allowed to pass laws like these without violating equal protection rights then those same states could also pass laws denying certain groups access to other fundamental rights such as voting or owning property - something he believed would be unconstitutional under both federal and state constitutions.

Opinion written by Justice SFMiller
Decided: Feb 13, 1867
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms